• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That reminds me that now in the office we’re dealing with windows machines where the network card just stops working, drivers are suddenly gone. Don’t ask, it’s windows, it’s Microsoft abd this is just considered normal. If a Linux machine has a bug it’s “oh my god Linux sucks sooo hard, it’s impossible to get it to work!” but this Microsoft bullshit just gets handwaved away with “well computers are complicated, let’s just reinstall this”

    Ah, yes, that. I switched in 2011 and the first impressions were about how flawless everything is compared to Windows.

    the plain security nightmare of having a windows machine…

    Eh, about that - Linux really isn’t immune to that. Just right now Windows is still by far the more profitable target.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Linux security is not perfect, nothing is. But compared to windows security? Come on, seriously? Is .exe still the extension that’ll automatically execute a program?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not sure this is anywhere near what a security comparison would look like.

        And the fact that the traditional Unix security model is being augmented with ACLs and selinux and what not hints, that it’s not sufficient. And what these things are being used for is, well, similar to Windows security model.

    • Trafficone@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s better now but twenty years ago some Linux distros were so insecure out of the box that you could be fully owned if you logged into the wrong network.

      Even still, I don’t see most distros leverage the security capabilities that running Linux enables. Linux runs the server side of the internet, being a niche os isn’t the security silver bullet it once was.

      • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pretty sure this guy didn’t use Linux twenty years ago. Outside of very basic computing, Linux wasn’t very useful.

        • Kevin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve been running Linux exclusively since 2001 or so. It was rough around the edges back then, but it was useful enough for what I needed.

          You had to choose a good distro on that note; redhat, mandrake, etc broke on me so many times, and I was only able to fully switch after finding slackware, which was rock solid.

          • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I remember suse and Debian where ahead of the curve back then. Package managers really changed the game when they started showing up around then. I will admit I’m probably a little too cynical. But I had to run windows through college for various software, and until recently playing most games on Linux was quite the challenge. Steam has truly cracked the code. So I’m dipping my toes back into Linux for daily use. I’ve been running my truenas server for a few years now and run several Linux VM’s so I’m not starting from scratch.

            • Kevin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I was pretty lucky in university as most of my profs were either using cross platform stuff or Linux exclusive software. I had a single class that wanted me using windows stuff and I just dropped that one.

              Awesome that you’re getting back into it, it’s definitely the best it’s ever been (and you’re right that Steam cracked the code). It sounds like you probably know what you’re doing if you’re running Linux VMs and stuff, but feel free to shoot me a PM if you run into any questions or issues I might be able to point you in the right direction for.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Pretty sure this guy built a 5 user machine with 5 monitors, keyboards, audio, all on a single 2gig Celeron machine. Built the software for all of it in 3 months. That is not 1 user on a desktop but 5 at the same time. 1 user was even back then better, bect I remember all the Regex.exe posts that is sooooo much easier than typing a command somewhere

          That was 17 years ago.