fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 29 days agoCursedmander.xyzimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1822arrow-down110
arrow-up1812arrow-down1imageCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 29 days agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·29 days agoProof via “just look at it”
minus-squareCheeseNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·29 days agoVisual proofs can be deceptive, e.g. the infinite chocolate bar.
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 days agoI feel like the pixalation on the rotated squares is enough to say this picture is not proof. Again I am not saying they are wrong, just that it would be extremely easy make a picture where it looks like all the squares are all the same size.
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·28 days agoI was joking about the proof but there’s a non-pixelated version in the comments here
Proof via “just look at it”
Visual proofs can be deceptive, e.g. the infinite chocolate bar.
I feel like the pixalation on the rotated squares is enough to say this picture is not proof.
Again I am not saying they are wrong, just that it would be extremely easy make a picture where it looks like all the squares are all the same size.
I was joking about the proof but there’s a non-pixelated version in the comments here