Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square151fedilinkarrow-up1704arrow-down114cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1690arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square151fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·12 hours agoIt’s absolutely dangerous but it doesnt have to work even a little to do damage; hell, it already has. Your thing just makes it sound much more capable than it is. And it is not. Also, it’s not AI.
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·8 hours agoNo, it matters. Youre pushing the lie they want pushed.
minus-squareHonytawk@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 hour agoAnd you’re pushing a hate train with no aspect of nuance to show for it. Seems like you are even less than 30% useful. And that is mainly because you can be used as fertilizer.
It’s absolutely dangerous but it doesnt have to work even a little to do damage; hell, it already has. Your thing just makes it sound much more capable than it is. And it is not.
Also, it’s not AI.
semantics.
No, it matters. Youre pushing the lie they want pushed.
And you’re pushing a hate train with no aspect of nuance to show for it.
Seems like you are even less than 30% useful. And that is mainly because you can be used as fertilizer.