• Skeezix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Affected, not impacted. Never use the word impacted when you mean affected. Use impacted when bodies collide.

    • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      At first I was thinking, why not use “impacted”, it sounds a little bit awkward, but I’ve definitely seen it being used in relatively formal situations (or at least that’s what I remember).

      But no, I looked it up and “impacted” should not be used in the sense of affected. TIL.

      • emb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Impact, impacted, impacts are totally fine for these use cases. As a native English speaker, I’d never heard of these rules against using them that way.

        But even if there is a rule, it doesn’t matter; if the terms are used this way and fully understood by both the speaker and listeners, then the rule is void.

        • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          For sure, I am just curious. Not to lecture others, for my own knowledge. :)

          I see where you are coming from, but as someone who speaks several other languages, I would say there can be benefits to lanagauge rules.

          • emb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That makes sense! I am a rule enjoyer, I guess I was responding more to the thread than to you in particular. It is good to be aware of the rules, but I also think they can sometimes hinder natural communication and create confusion.

            • darthelmet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              The way I look at it, it would be better if we had a nice, consistent language with rules that make sense but… we don’t have that. English is a nonsense language with more exceptions than rules. So if I’m going to have to deal with something that doesn’t make sense in the first place, I’d rather just go with the flow. If Shakespeare can make up words, so can I.

      • datavoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wow, reading this has a huge impact on me…

        While the definition may disagree, I would argue that language is constantly evolving, and the actual meaning of words is based on how you use them.

      • mohab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Where did you look it up?

        Merriam-Webster defines it as:

        the force of impression of one thing on another : a significant or major effect

        And lists “affect” as a synonym when impact is used as a verb.

        • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just a quick web search; the first few results which linked to dictionary style resources.

          Now I am confused. :)

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If media can say “slammed” to mean “said something about”, I can use “impacted” to mean “affected”. Especially when we have the word “impactful”.

        • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Didn’t mean to imply you can’t, I was just curious about the formal rules for the word.

          And it seems “impacted” can be used in the sense of “affected”.

          I am confused :)

        • Skeezix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          “Impactful” is a heinous travesty of the language. I’ve actually seen “impactfulness” used too. Also bad is “impacts” … “the stock market has suffered several impacts due to low business confidence.” This cumbersome wording tries to amp up the drama. It’s much cleaner to say “The stock market has been affected by low business confidence.” Aside from the shock value of replacing “affected” with impacted, a metaphor for bodily collision, many have turned to impacted because the subtle difference between affected and effected intimidates them.

          Be the better person. Avoid the hokey metaphor.

          Btw, media uses “slammed” and “pounds” and other Batman words simply because they get more clicks than rebuked or chastized. Don’t be a headline writer.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            “impacts” has been in my vocabulary for as long as I remember, and it’s common to use it that way. The dictionaries even have that definition.

            I’m not afraid of language evolving.