• Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      True. Which still leads to an infestation.

      On non-logarithmic scale:

      And don’t forget that shown is just the last couple of thousand of years - there are 4 more millions of years prior to this of slow growth (and some collapses) but it wouldn’t even register on such a chart.

      Ugh, I guess this is far off topic.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The average growth rate from 10,000 BCE to 1700 was just 0.04% per year.

        Wow that’s crazy to me. I had always envisioned humans steadily spreading and growing constantly. I had no idea that we were basically treading water for so long.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, 4 million years of various “humanoid” species cohabiting & barely making it through (one big event wiping out the whole species - that’s why we have such a shallow gene pool & all look “identical” relative to difs in other species).

          But the rapid growth was always unsustainable, the gens lived on natural wealth that they just took out of (into?) the economy way quicker than the replenishing cycle. But the difference between a million and a billon is unimaginable, that’s why we can now witness the collapse (mass extinction event) within a generation.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Love the malthusianism. Why focus on person or life quality when you can terminate your thoughts with ‘human bad’?

        No need to ever fix or grow if just ‘human bad’.