• Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Not that i disagree with you, but coherence is one of those things that highly subjective and context dependent.

      A non-science inclined person reading most scientific papers would think it was incoherent.

      Not because it couldn’t be written in a way more comprehensible to the non-science person, but because that’s not the target audience.

      The audience that is targeted will have a lot of the same shared context/knowledge and thus would be able to decipher the content.

      It could well be that he’s talking using context, knowledge and language/phrasing that’s not in the normal lexicon.

      I don’t think that’s what’s happening here, but it’s not impossible.