• rdri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I’ve found a workaround”

    Workaround (according to article): “First of all, YouTube Premium”

    The actual workaround (according to article): “Two words: uBlock Origin. Yes, I know that Google has blocked it from its Chrome Extension store, but there is still a way to get uBlock Origin on Chrome”

    Seems like they are being paid by Google. Actual workaround should be to drop Chrome.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      My thoughts exactly, what a heap of crap. Tom’s Guide used to be one of the good ones out there, real shame.

      What I was wondering though is if they detect browser plugins through some public ID - how difficult is it to change those? In Firefox it’s absolutely trivial, you can simply download the extension, open it as a zip file, and then edit the files inside with a text editor and change the ID.

      Haven’t used chrome for years, but extensions used to be javascript files just as well, so I doubt they are that hard to edit. Unless they found a way to block installations from local files and enforce their shop, no idea if that’s a thing.

      • rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        if they detect browser plugins through some public ID - how difficult is it to change those?

        I actually dismissed that one from the get go since there is not confirmation of any mechanism they described in the article. Not going to spend time on technical-looking explanations from someone who calls a whole another extension a “workaround”. Might as well be the case of broken or outdated filters in ABP.

        I’m sure if some major site finds a way to know your extensions we’ll see some major unsolvable issues.