• just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 个月前

    I’m guessing the vast majority of its users are students and corporate employees, neither of which get a say in which software is used.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 个月前

      They have no say… up until everyone actually says something. Then maybe we do have a say.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        Uhuh. Let me know how that works for you, out in a real corporate setting.

        In my experience you can say all you want (if you’re lucky), but in the end, switching providers on a large scale costs a lot of money. And their money is more important than your discomfort.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 个月前

          Convincing just one person there is an issue is progress. Cooperating with another for better negotiations is progress.

          Are there benefits of promoting inaction?

          • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 个月前

            You can either pick a battle that you cannot win (assuming you’re not the one in charge of the many millions such a migration would cost). You can just deal with it, or you can look for better circumstances.

            You say you’re convincing people, management sees a trouble maker who’s spreading unhappiness.

            In my opinion, it’s better to save your energy for something where it can make a change, not a futile attempt at trying to make an institute drop Outlook or Teams, or whatever shitty software we’re talking about.

            But hey, this is just my advice. You do you.