JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agodotnet developerprogramming.devimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down10
arrow-up137arrow-down1imagedotnet developerprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squareNegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoJust because it’s no longer supported doesn’t mean there’s not some poor intern refactoring spaghetti backend in a basement somewhere using it.
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoSure, but you can still find plenty of info on it by searching for .NET Framework or .NET 4.6. All the documentation is still available. Its just not in the spotlight any more.
minus-squareLmaydev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoIt is very much still supported and will be for a very long time. You just shouldn’t start any new products using it.
minus-squareZangoose@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoHi, it’s me, the intern refactoring the spaghetti .NET core backend. I’m not in a basement though. AMA
minus-squareneutron@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI am so sorry, man. No one deserves this.
Just because it’s no longer supported doesn’t mean there’s not some poor intern refactoring spaghetti backend in a basement somewhere using it.
Sure, but you can still find plenty of info on it by searching for .NET Framework or .NET 4.6. All the documentation is still available. Its just not in the spotlight any more.
It is very much still supported and will be for a very long time.
You just shouldn’t start any new products using it.
Hi, it’s me, the intern refactoring the spaghetti .NET core backend. I’m not in a basement though. AMA
I am so sorry, man. No one deserves this.