It’s not fun interacting with them when they often want to engage in ad hominems. This is why I have no interest in the tankie triad.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ye, we obviously can have some acerbic users as well, can’t avoid it 12k registrations. But if someone is too toxic consistently, we tend to get rid of them. Still doesn’t make the instance tankie thought 😅

    • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      But if someone is too toxic consistently, we tend to get rid of them.

      What if they are admins that seem to follow someone or at least constantly be needlessly rude and aggressive towards and lie about a certain individual?

      (Not to make any claims or anything about dbzer0 being tankie)

        • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So, if there is a feedback loop where if dbzer0 users are ultimately okay with an admin harassing people, then the toxicity can persist? As long as they can convince others with lies then the admin can get away with it? That “tend to” in my quote seems to be doing some real heavy lifting, from my perspective.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You’d prefer that one person decide by fiat what’s OK or not? I don’t know about you but I find democracy superior to dictatorship, even when nominally “benevolent” .

            • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              So, obvious harassment and toxicity needs to be put to a vote for any action to be taken? Yeah, I’m going to have to disagree on that one.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Clearly, it’s not “obvious” at all. Again, we anarchists tend to prefer democracy over dictatorship.

                • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I wasn’t necessarily referring only to the specific circumstance. I was also pointing out the flaw in the logic of “only democracy”.

                  Again, my point was that a common feedback loop and/or an alignment of a person’s toxicity can easily protect someone from justice. Similar to what is happening to the US political parties, particularly the Republican party. Plenty of people align and agree with what is happening and thus it is allowed to continue and even escalate.

                  As long as someone can paint a better picture and have a following to support then, then a person can get away with seemingly anything at dbzer0. Just gotta get those votes from the people willing and able to participate during the voting period.