Is your argument legitimately over the usage of a word? You won’t even entertain any of the human rights abuses because it doesn’t contain your safe word? That’s not how literacy works.
Okay, well, the term “violation” is mentioned 80 times. “Abuse” 24 times. “Detain/detainees” mentioned 721 times.
All major human rights organisations in the world call Gaza a genocide.
Can someone link me just one which calls it the “Uyghur genocide”?
Removed by mod
“Genocide is the wrong word to describe the horrors in XinJiang”
Wow great job on that one. You found the word genocide in a link in the 160 page report and it proves my point.
A link is not a claim by Amnesty by the way.
you haven’t even read that article, headline reader. If you did, you’d know that’s a deliberately provocative headline. lol
or the amnesty one for that matter
you also don’t know how sources work
quadruple F
The 160 page report also does not contain Amnesty using the term genocide.
It only contains the three links which you pretend are evidence because you know you are utterly wrong.
Is there even an accusation of the crime of “Extermination”? Which is basically genocide without proving intent. That is what Israel got initially.
Is your argument legitimately over the usage of a word? You won’t even entertain any of the human rights abuses because it doesn’t contain your safe word? That’s not how literacy works.
Okay, well, the term “violation” is mentioned 80 times. “Abuse” 24 times. “Detain/detainees” mentioned 721 times.
Yes words have meaning. Guantanamo Bay is also many human rights abuses but not targeted extermination of an entire group.
Thank you for conceding the argument. I agree with the second paragraph of your comment.
Removed by mod
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Why do you doubt the genocide of the Uyghurs?
Please don’t creep out on the votes and start arguments based on assumptions. If I wanted to debate, I would have commented.
Wait he just pinged you out of the blue because he looked at the voting count and needed you to explain yourself?
Holy shit, even .ml doesn’t do that.
What is even happening
I make exceptions for admins, and you certainly want to engage, considering you’ve been downvoting comments critical of tankies in the past.
Voting is absolutely not “wanting to engage”. Also jumping to conclusions based on voting patterns is just a recipe for drama.
Well, I’m giving you a good opportunity now to explain
Seriously mate? You don’t get to demand an interrogation whenever you fancy out of people.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I appreciate the sentiment but please don’t pile on for my sake. Hexbear does that as well and I know it’s frustrating to be on the receiving side
Removed by mod
Why does Amnesty deny it?
Why does Human Rights watch deny it?
Why does Doctors Without Borders deny it?
They don’t? Someone linked it so you can read it for yourself (or rather didn’t)
take the L
Surely you can link to that comment.
literally scroll up
literally scroll up
Well you got a link and it didn’t say genocide, so therefore they think it’s genocide. And now you’re banned for asking for proof.
What is this, Hexbear?
Removed by mod