• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I mean, NATO economies and secret agents (and, these days, corporations) do plenty of influence campaigns too, but I get the sentiment.

    It’s the mind boggling lack of self awareness that drops my jaw more than any actual politics. Justification doesn’t even matter.

    Like all that finger wagging about a century of ‘imperialist wars’ in one breath, then defending the Ukraine war the next… Even if the invasion is totally justified, which it’s not, do tankies not see the history!? And how hilarious it is to obsess over western exceptionalism then insist ‘this war is different! It’s totally going okay!’ like apologists straight from the Vietnam era?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        The ISW has some great observations about such Telegram channels in their reports. It seems like the Kremlin balances them on a knife’s edge: they “allow” the independent Telegram war influencers to exist. But if any get too critical of Putin’s government, they get reigned in. Too militant at the other extreme, which is a thing, believe it or not, and they get reigned in too.

        It all paints the picture of Putin balancing not only internal anti-war dissent, but also voices and actors even more militant than him.

        There are a lot of parallels with Trump’s government too, such as how influencers will criticize Putin’s subordinates, but almost never attack Putin directly, even when something is obviously his fault.

        …Anyway, where I’m going with this is:

        Russian Telegram channels with millions of users are sad about not killing more Ukrainians.

        This is no accident, and the Kremlin is not unaware.