wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down19
arrow-up1206arrow-down1external-linkHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comwikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareSpacetimeMachine@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·7 days agoThat’s ridiculous. It’s not allowed because it’s not a primary source of information. It’s a great jumping off point for knowledge and if you need to cite something you can just look through its sources at the bottom of each page.
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down26·7 days agoI don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·7 days agoTheir point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia. It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
minus-squareSckharshantallas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-25 days agoYou totally misunderstood the comment.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 days agoBait used to be believable
That’s ridiculous. It’s not allowed because it’s not a primary source of information. It’s a great jumping off point for knowledge and if you need to cite something you can just look through its sources at the bottom of each page.
I don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
Their point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia.
It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
You totally misunderstood the comment.
Bait used to be believable
deleted by creator
Yep, graduated!