Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to aww@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoIt really didreddthat.comimagemessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up1870arrow-down160
arrow-up1810arrow-down1imageIt really didreddthat.comLady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to aww@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square162fedilink
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·2 days agoAgain art is very subjective. Your own personal bias place role to how much you like or dislike that particular picture however from an absolutely technical standpoint it’s very close to the original not quite there but close.
minus-squarechoochooMF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·21 hours agoIts really not.
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoI mean if you’re not able to put aside your own personal bias and look at the comparison from a purely objective standpoint that’s not my problem.
Again art is very subjective. Your own personal bias place role to how much you like or dislike that particular picture however from an absolutely technical standpoint it’s very close to the original not quite there but close.
Its really not.
I mean if you’re not able to put aside your own personal bias and look at the comparison from a purely objective standpoint that’s not my problem.
Lots of assumptions.