Tad Lispy@europe.pub to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoMatrix? No, thanks. — Hackea documentacióhackea.orgexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up15arrow-down1external-linkMatrix? No, thanks. — Hackea documentacióhackea.orgTad Lispy@europe.pub to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-text
The article alleges that Matrix: has links to Israeli intelligence. sends a lot of sensitive data to matrix.org servers, even when Synapse is self-hosted. Is this information accurate?
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 day agoNo, not all platforms store metadata, much less absolutely all of it unencrypted. Further, other platforms are less centralized.
minus-squareTad Lispy@europe.pubOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoWhat’s a better alternative? Which other platforms are you referring to? How do they compare in terms of features and adoption? From all the decentralised, e2e encrypted platforms I tried, matrix is the only one more or less accessible for normies.
No, not all platforms store metadata, much less absolutely all of it unencrypted. Further, other platforms are less centralized.
What’s a better alternative? Which other platforms are you referring to? How do they compare in terms of features and adoption? From all the decentralised, e2e encrypted platforms I tried, matrix is the only one more or less accessible for normies.