• TheMadCodger@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Your edit is a bit like that in the Fediverse in general. Since there’s no algorithm, liking a post in Mastodon does nothing beyond letting op know you appreciate them. I like that.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I hate this phrase. There are several algorithms. There’s new, hot, rising, etc. There’s no company manipulating content discovery. That’s the difference. Algorithms are great. For-profit companies with an incentive to control content is bad.

      • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In the Lemmy word, sure. I was referring to Mastodon where there is no hot or rising. It’s just based off of who you’re following and when you check. Hence likes doing nothing but informing the poster of your appreciation.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I guess fair enough, though every other federated site I know of uses some other algorithm, and you seem to have been talking about the fediverse in general, not Mastodon, except for the example. Still, Mastodon’s sort is still an algorithm. You can’t display anything without an algorithm. That word just means a set of rules to complete a task. Mastodon uses one that only uses who you’re following and time to decide what to display.

          Algorithms aren’t the issue. We can have sophisticated algorithms that help users find the content they want. That’s great. It’s when there is an incentive, and ability, to influence the algorithm by the platform controllers when there’s an issue. The fediverse solves this not by ditching algorithms, but by having no singular controller.