• SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, it’s not a good movie. I did enjoy the mystery of it though, it does build up nicely until the big reveal of what they look like.

    • Ricky Rigatoni@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      This describes most of his movies. Good build up to the mystery with a payoff so bad it retroactively makes everything before it worse.

      • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wait, I never thought about that and this is probably the best and most accurate description of how his movies are.

        I recently saw Glass for the very first time. Rewatched Unbreakable and Split just to refresh the memory. And I was happy with Glass until I was halfway through. Afterwards, everything was just set on fire and I was left with nothing.

        • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yeah, the Shamalayan “twist” is that halfway through every flick, the creative flow becomes an untethered spray. Picture, if you will, a olde-timey grinder producing a length of sausage when suddenly, the casing comes loose… so the crank doubles its speed. How M. Night’s movies get made. 😶 (If you look closely, stamped into the steel there is the ShamaWurst logo.)