• Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Honestly I wouldn’t mind if a company charged like, $1/month or something reasonable like that but for some reason some asshole made it standard practice to charge $10-$15/month for literally anything and now everyone uses that as the starting point for their “services”

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m choosing to pronounce the first part of your handle as “roog” instead of pyre. Also, have an upvote. That’s way too many downvotes for sharing an earnest opinion.

    • overload@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Maybe if they have you the mouse for free a sub fee a per month would be reasonable. But it’s a mouse. What killer software could one be paying for for a mouse subscription.

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah I was more thinking the mouse be free plus any replacements in the future.

        Then you would break even after about 5 years ($60)

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Unfortunately I believe that was still a mouse you’d have to pay for up front, you’d just get a subscription on top of that.

          • buttnugget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Oh, I’m sure you pay the whole price up front. You can’t think like a rational person with these things, only a capitalist. The only thing that changes is that now Logitech has a stable revenue stream and gets to turn off your mouse if you stop paying for even a second.