• trailee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Providing the text or an archive link separately may be polite, but your request goes too far. If somebody shares a paywalled link that is on topic for the community, you have several options. You can ignore it and miss out, and be no worse off. You can find an archive copy yourself, and even share it in a comment to receive fake internet points. You can enjoy the discussion in the comments and maybe find other relevant links there. But you’re suggesting that the community is better off with fewer posts and less participation (“please don’t [post] unless”).

    The community rules include

    Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post

    That’s a much nicer way of stating a preference to have OPs do the legwork. Please don’t discourage community participation.

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      To be fair, the sidebar itself suggests copying the content over if they’re paywalled. It’s nuts that you’ve highlighted that, and then complained about a rephrasing of what it says.

      • trailee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s nuts to me that you can’t see the nuance in the difference between “please don’t [post]” and “maybe copy [the article text] into the post”.

        The “maybe” in there is doing a lot of work converting that into a suggested guideline rather than being a hard rule, and a polite request to follow the guideline is appropriate. But the nuance of “don’t post unless” is distinctly discouraging participation, and not appropriate.

          • trailee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            ???

            I don’t think I’m being particularly rude here, but the reason why I’m engaging is that OP didn’t do anything wrong and I’m glad they made the post.

            I dislike paywalls and registrationwalls as much as most people, but the overall lemmyverse isn’t large enough to discourage posters who link to interesting on topic content. That is rude.

      • trailee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        At the time I’m submitting this one, this post has 77 comments, including a few with OP engaging in replies. There are several distinct healthy discussions that occurred in this post long before you complained that OP didn’t put in enough effort by violating 404’s copyright because you feel entitled to have a low-effort doomscrolling experience. OP isn’t the one hurting the community here.

        • quick_snail@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          People are commenting on a headline they can’t read. Lots of misinformation follows. Yes, that’s harmful