“The new device is built from arrays of resistive random-access memory (RRAM) cells… The team was able to combine the speed of analog computation with the accuracy normally associated with digital processing. Crucially, the chip was manufactured using a commercial production process, meaning it could potentially be mass-produced.”

Article is based on this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01477-0

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Look, It’s one of those articles again. The bi-monthly “China invents earth-shattering technology breakthrough that we never hear about again.”

    “1000x faster?” Learn to lie better. Real technological improvements are almost always incremental, like “10-20% faster, bigger, stronger.” Not 1000 freaking times faster. You lie like a child. Or like Trump.

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      “1000x faster?” Learn to lie better

      Analogue computers are indeed capable of doing a task 1000x faster than a regular computer. The difference is they do only that task, in a very specific way, and with one specific type of output. You can 3D print at home an “analogue computer” that can solve calculus equations, it can technically be faster than a CPU, but that’s the only thing it can do, it’s complex, and the output is a drawing on paper.

      If you come up with a repeatable and precise set of mechanical movements that are analogous to the problem you want to solve, you can indeed come up with headlines like that.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because until it hits market, it’s almost meaningless. These journalists do the same shit with drugs in trials or early research.

    • notarobot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It can be 1000x faster because it analog. Analog things take very very little time to compute stuff. We don’t generally use them because they are very hard to get the same result twice and updating is also hard