• KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Then vegetables and plant forms washed in contaminated water because that’s all there is. “The Sheep Look Up”. Surprising how accurate that guy was.

  • awful_neutral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    21 hours ago

    C’mon man.

    Just skimming the abstract is enough to tell you that this article doesn’t say that. Why cite something you didn’t actually read?

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s not what that seems to say at all. It doesn’t even look like it says “if we do nothing, we can’t grow these crops anymore”. It seems to be specifically about stratospheric aerosol injection (a specific geoengineering technique that we haven’t even committed to trying as yet), and suggests that if you use it to keep global temperatures stable, there can still be changes in where these crops can grow because changes to things like rainfall and humidity. I’ve not read the entire thing but from a glance at it’s conclusions, their simulations suggest that the crops would remain economically important to their growing regions under all their simulations, just with the viable amount that can be grown and the specific areas for doing it changed per region, and that using SAI to offset warming doesn’t simply result in the same yields as not having the warming would have the way one might otherwise expect.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      yeah it’s not as severe as the meme says, but I think it’s a tad more severe than you’re making it sound 😅

      Climate change is affecting growing conditions across the globe. Natural climate variability may exacerbate the impact of increasing temperature and shifting precipitation patterns, leading to large interannual variations in yields, potentially resulting in revenue loss.

      large variations in yields for the average person effectively means it’ll get way more expensive to buy, as farmers who can’t afford a bad yield will go bankrupt when they have one and will have to sell thier farms, and others will switch to a more stable crop reducing supply…

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh it wasnt my intention to make it sound like climate change doesnt negatively impact anything, but “these things get more expensive” is a very different thing than “these crops are going extinct and theres nothing that can be done about it” the way that headline seems to imply.

    • Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thank you. We need to be aware of climate change, but crying wolf and false interpretation of the science isn’t the way to get people on board.

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 day ago

    C’mon lemmy, at least pretend to be better than reddit when it comes to zero effort memes…

    That’s not at all what the link claims, and isn’t even close to the title of that study.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Find the guy who genetically engineered algae to secrete THC and get him to repeat that for caffeine and theobromine.

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Will it be the same, or will it be even worse quality than kitkats these days? 😔