Passkeys are built on the FIDO2 standard (CTAP2 + WebAuthn standards). They remove the shared secret, stop phishing at the source, and make credential-stuffing useless.

But adoption is still low, and interoperability between Apple, Google, and Microsoft isn’t seamless.

I broke down how passkeys work, their strengths, and what’s still missing

  • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yeah the moods in this thread, like

    “[I don’t understand this]!”

    “[I don’t trust this]!”

    “[It doesn’t fix everything]!”

    “[This doesn’t benefit me]!”

    “[What’s wrong with old way]!?”

    And like, all valid feelings… just the reactions are a bit… intense? Especially considering it’s a beta stage auth option that amounts to a fancy version of the old sec key industry standard, not the mark of the beast.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Because we all know it will eventually go from a “neat” to mandatory with vendor lock-in for no other reason than “fuck you”.

      We’ve all seen it a few hundred times now with X, and Y.

      I get a few daily pop-ups for “Want to use a pass key”. One from my bank. No I don’t want to link my fingerprint to my bank account especially in a way that will lock me out when I replace my phone.

      Remember folks: Biometrics (What you are) is not constitutionally protected but what you know is (for now at least).

      • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You do not need your fingerprint or any other biometric to use a passkey.

        You do not lose access to passkeys when you lose your device.