I think car privacy isn’t talked about amongst any privacy enthusiasts online ever, and it apparently is one of the biggest data collectors out there. For someone like me who values electric cars for there affordability and environmental reasons, but still want physical car buttons and control over my data, how would I go about this?

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ah, yes, here come the “just use your old car because EVs are worse for the environment than the Exxon Valdez or something” posts

    That is a myth thoroughly debunked by just a little bit of research and data collection into the making and driving of EVs, as that assumption ran off an old study that used guesstimated worst-case scenario numbers and don’t really reflect what the actual numbers are.

    If you want to avoid being tracked, you will have to disconnect the data modem somehow - it is part of your radio antenna. If it gets no power, it gets no connection. Either disconnect from the telematics unit, or at the antenna. Also, you can disconnect your telematics unit itself - the “black box” that lives under the dash and records your driving. Some aftermarket makers have “dummy plug” connectors which will trick the car into thinking it is connected. These are often used with aftermarket head units.

    Beware that some cars are tracked by your financial lender, and they don’t like it when this happens. Some other cars actually have to be cloud connected once in a while or they stop working - which is the worst thing modern cars can do.

    • PearOfJudes@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I as a person wouldn’t even blame myself for buying an ICE car because I blame corporations for global warming etc. But I just want an EV because it’s cheaper to run, is more environmentally friendly, I can plug in to a wall socket at home, charge with solar panels etc.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Cars are the problem. I am agnostic to whether the car is powered by steam, diesel, gasoline, or electricity. Tail-pipe emissions are a very small part of the overall pollution from a car.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Prove it’s a myth. I find it really hard to believe me going and purchasing a new car is better then using an already existing car. Manufacturing has a big cost for cars.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Rough math involved: production of a new EV results in between 8-15 tonnes of CO2 emissions, depending on the size of the batteries and vehicle trim.

        But let’s aim for somewhere in the middle and take ~12 tonnes as a yardstick.

        ~12 tonnes of CO2 emissions equates to roughly 1,350 gallons of fuel.

        Depending of fuel efficiency, this would equate to between 20k~45k miles.

        Feel free to double-check my math in case I did anything wrong, but it does validate that most of these „facts” around EVs are likely FUD spread by fossil fuel aligned sources.

        ETA: initially forgot to include CO2 emissions from electricity generation - but this varies wildly based on source (nuclear, hydro & renewables at 0 etc.)

        • bob@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I find this a bit misleasing, especially when (in the uk) electricity is only ~50% renewables apparently.

          https://www.zemo.org.uk/assets/workingdocuments/MC-P-11-15a Lifecycle emissions report.pdf

          For example, a typical medium sized family car will create around 24 tonnes of CO2 during its life cycle, while an electric vehicle (EV) will produce around 18 tonnes over its life. For a battery EV, 46% of its total carbon footprint is generated at the factory.

          So EVs are a small improvement. Since I enjoy older cars and my privacy a lot more, I’m gonna keep enjoying them and not let manafacturers ram EVs down my throat, especially when a lot of them are hideous SUVs.

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Not intentionally being misleading, as I do have a footnote calling out not including carbon emissions from electricity generation as they vary so wildly based on the energy source.

            But unlike ICE cars, EV emissions from energy sources are improving over time as nations build more and more renewable energy sources. Your linked report is correct, but potentially out of date already - the UK for instance was already at 58% in 2024, with a goal of full of 95%+ by the end of this decade.

            Here in Australia, our uptake of residential solar has been so high that our energy providers are offering free electricity during peak daylight hours to all customers to help use up all of that excess production. It’s quite feasible for a significant portion of us here to be able to not only recharge an EV for free, but with next-to-no CO2 emissions.

            Additionally, we now have a big Government subsidy in place to install batteries in our homes as well: ~£4,000 for a ~30kWh system, fully installed!

            I share your love for older cars, but with a toddler and another one planned - we need to have a modern, safe car for peace of mind. But believe me, I will be ensuring that I disable as much telemetry as possible due to privacy concerns.

            But for a secondary/weekend car - there is always the option of electrifying an older car, allowing for the best of both worlds - in a sense!

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          By “tonnes”, do you mean 2,000lb or 1,000kg? In an engineering context, “ton” is the former and “tonne” is the latter.

          “Tonne” is also synonymous with “long ton” (dur to converting to 2204.6lb), as well as “metric ton”.

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Metric tonnes, as that seems to be the generally used format when discussing CO2 emissions.

            Which I know may be confusing, given that I quote imperial values in the rest of the stats - but it was just quick/dirty math and I figured that EV disinformation is highest in the US, so I tried to tailor the values for them.

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It was rough, back of the napkin math - primarily intended for those in places where EV disinformation is highest (the US).

            Those of us that primarily use metric are more than capable of roughly converting in our heads as required! 😅

      • monovergent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Especially wrt. modern gas-fuelled cars for the typical driver as EV prices are artificially jacked up in many Western countries.

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just to point out that you made the initial argument and commented a view without evidence. Now you ask someone who disagrees to give evidence?