Source https://jlai.lu/comment/17891842

Modlog https://photon.lemmy.world/modlog?user=15620879&community=32

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input “lemmy.ml” and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

@pokexpert30@jlai.lu

Here you go achievement unlocked!

  • kingofras@lemmy.worldEnglish
    26·
    1 day ago

    Good god, it’s worse than I thought.

    There’s not really any discussion necessary. The more depraved he gets, the more you’ll look like an enabler. Certainly with those straw man arguments.

    A mod has to keep the community they mod safe, and to an extent keep the top level posts and comments on topic. Nobody elected you and you are actively censoring. Like RT, Fox, and Chinese state television.

    • If you think it can be done, don’t encourage it, but do it yourself.

    TIL the censoring mod on Lemmy is against assembly or group revolution, but doesn’t mind snipers taking a shot. K.

    • posDetected@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      14·
      13 hours ago

      From the people that banned “from the river to the sea” because that was a “call to genocide” lmao

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      62·
      1 day ago

      What? I’m saying it’s super easy to encourage violence for others to do, but sit safe in your home while you watch the world burn. I think you might have lost the plot.

      • kingofras@lemmy.worldEnglish
        27·
        1 day ago

        Mate, not everyone is in the US. Due to a hiccup in globalisation, elections over there have no integrity and a child pedophile has been tearing down stuff which affects the whole fucking world.

        If I was there, I wouldn’t hesitate a second to rise a mob against him, but I’m not, and I obviously will never be. Some of us can only support possible violence from a distance.

        Anyway, you’re already at the name calling stage, so I’m not going to change your mind, just know each time you’re “not banning” someone, you’re still reducing the online appearance of dissent and therefore making it look like people are okay with his bullcrap. You are painting and coercing a picture, and that picture is regime friendly.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          41·
          1 day ago

          If I was there, I wouldn’t hesitate a second to rise a mob against him, but I’m not, and I obviously will never be. Some of us can only support possible violence from a distance.

          Why aren’t you flying here and doing something about it? I mean it, it effects you. Last comment.