As per fsf only those linux distributions are 100% free:

Dragora
Dyne
Guix
Hyperbola
Parabola
PureOS
Trisquel
Ututo
libreCMC
ProteanOS

Do you agree or no?

I see a lot of people that want to switch from windows to a linux distro or a open os. But from what i see they tend to migrate to another black boxed/closed os.

What is a trully free os that doesnt included any closed code/binary blobs/closed drivers etc.

Just 100% free open code, no traps.

What are the options and what should one go with if they want fully free os that rejects any closed code?

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    13 hours ago

    We need purists like the fsf. They are truly fighting the good fight, but I am also happy to see people be just more free too, even with some compromise.

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I agree, rhetoric like OP’s framing a non-FOSS distro as ‘just another closed source/black boxed OS’ reads like OP is suggesting it isn’t even worth migrating from Windows to say, Bazzite. Which is dangerous.

      I’ll take a door I can peer into but has a few shadows over a completely closed door anyday.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We need purists like the fsf.

      I do not mind that they are purists. On this issue, my problem is that the line they draw between open and proprietary is an entirely meaningless one and yet the act as absolutist about it as everything else.

      I do not mind that they are “pure”. I dislike that what they are saying is wrong (inaccurate, not morally wrong).

      The operating system and up seems like a totally resonance place to draw the line for Free Software. I mean “software” is right in the name.

      Making a big deal about firmware is asking me to pretend I do not know how hardware works and ignore that I am actually using totally proprietary tech regardless. And classifying hardware that is more open as less free just jumps the shark completely. It hear no evil, see no evil nonsense that demands that I never ask questions or look behind the curtain.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I do disagree with you. Proprietary firmware and proprietary hardware does make you less free. But if the rental agreement you have with them is good enough for you, why would I bash you for it, you know?

        Its why RISCV is exciting in the CPU space to me. Its more free (even if the IP under it is proprietary). Every step we take towards it advanced the field to me. Again though, if you are renting any piece of the stack, it’s still better that you own what you can to do what you/want then just giving into the “you will own nothing” push.

        Just gotta take the wins where we can, celebrate the work, and keep working, you know?