• Ferk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    It’s meant in the sense of “underwhelming” (as shown by the follow-up comment the article references). It’s not incompatible to be surprised at how capable AI is (ie. being “impressed”) and at the same time be also unwilling to pay the costs / repercussions and want to ban / regulate it.

    In this context, being deeply unimpressed with something is equivalent to calling that something “irrelevant” / “incapable”. If AI was no more impressive than it was before the LLM boom then there wouldn’t have been such a reaction against it to begin with. If anything, people being now opposed to modern AI is proof of how impactful AI has become.

    • Liam Proven@social.vivaldi.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      @Ferk Ah, I see.

      I suppose so.

      As a one-time committee member on Skeptics in the Pub, there are a lot of things in life that *demonstrably* Do Not Work, never did work, and can be proved not to ever be possible, which all the same, billions of people are very impressed by.

      Homeopathy is my go-to example – see:

      https://www.howdoeshomeopathywork.com/

      This is true of all Supplementary, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. It’s all a S.C.A.M. ;-)

      But it goes much further. Gods, for example. All 100% made up.

      And yet…