Welp, I remembered this post and it’s most likely valid CD-audio, just with awful noise.

I know, among other things there is a time code inserted very frequently between audio data, without which seeking would not be possible at all. However, the audio uses over 90 % of the data so it’s largely responsible for the overall appearance of the track.

I fail to see any mistake. A comma belongs to either side of the word “Linux” there.

Records are very easy to understand. Even without a microscope, you can see periodic patterns on test vinyls with beeps. And sound being periodic motion is also obvious from string and percussive instruments.

You can even see tracks starting and ending on pressed CDs under the right lighting with your own eyes. I wonder, is the encoding of silence (approx. 2 seconds) really that different or does the density of grooves or pit/land pattern intentionally differ to help the player seek there faster? I know that uncompressed audio naturally results in a repeated pattern when silence is encoded but given the 8-to-14 modulation and other error correctiion techniques, I find it hard to believe it would result in significantly different density unless they specifically added a special mode just for encoding silence that makes the track brighter-colored for easier coarse seeking.

Earth: layer below electricity, melting and disintegrating

Elon Musk: boring through Earth and strapping hopelessly tiny, exploding rockets to the “Electricity” block to get everything to Mars

Sun: lowermost layer but extending a fist labeled “2027 solar flare” at internet infrastructure

Also removed windows and shifted the bricks from a ⊞ pattern into a staggered one.

I think GNU is worth more than 0.5 Gemini

deleted by creator

Make: command not found

Capitalization is important on UNIX!

Not really world clocks, they just try to use JavaScript to display the device’s time.

Almost ¾ of each 8-bit part! That’s about 230x of the current space!

They check the other requirements too, presumably

⠀ 🐸⠀ ⠀  🐸⠀  🐸

^🐸_🐸𓆏^🐸 _🐸

⠀  🐸⠀ ⠀  🐸

The thumb counts too so it should be 6

What is the problem?

Mine too! I looked through all of Unicode and they don’t have the awesome-looking L I know from college, only the “script” variant.

Oh, I was thinking of it as 𝑦 = 𝑒^𝑥 or 𝑥 = ln 𝑦, whose derivative in respect to 𝑦 is 𝑥 = 1/𝑦 (for 𝑦 > 0) or 𝑦 = 1/𝑥 (for 𝑥 > 0). Your interpretation is that the 𝑦-axis is non-existent or named differently, which is why I’d prefer the joke to say d/d𝑡 for less ambiguity, as @anothercatgirl suggested.

𝑒^𝑥 has been around since the 17^th century and it hasn’t changed since. Therefore, it’s a constant with respect to time and gets unceremoniously derived to 0.

The result is 𝑦 = ⅟ₓ, right?

Here, have this:
𝑒ˣ
ᵈ⁄d𝑥
ℒ

Even plain text textboxes can do fun stuff if there is good Unicode support