

My hot take : lots of projects would benefit from a traditional project management cycle instead of trying to force Agile on every projects.


My hot take : lots of projects would benefit from a traditional project management cycle instead of trying to force Agile on every projects.


So back to cable packages. Fucking dumb
Because the mathematics literature fucking sucks.
It is written by math nerds for math nerds. Show me all the fucking proof, you just spent 10 pages talking about anything and everything but you can’t expand on how your formula has been transformed because of whatever theorem.
How many god damn time have I read something akin to “the proof is left to the reader. The resulting formula is [something entirely new].”
Like fuck you, show me how it’s done.
Tired of the constant pop ups in windows 10. The constant upselling of their product.
An OS shouldn’t get in the way of what you are doing and Windows was always popping up some bullshit.


Make something free for it then? The stuff is open and the license makes it so that it stays that way legally (though, in real life, it’s different but that’s another discussion) and any and all other contributions made to the project stays open source.
What shell do you recommend?


Palantir could refuse to accept the mandate and the money, but they didn’t. So the governments are evil, and so is Palantir


Employers can go suck a big fat cock.
If the enployee can communicate with their managers and co-worker in English when needed and talk in an other language when they talk between them, there’s nothing wrong.
If you stick to popular free software, the jank is limited.
The Linux userspaces have a lot of enthusiastic people that create their own software and share it, and thus it seems like there is lot of janky stuff (because there is).
It feels like Windows has been captured by corporations and so the market is competitive. There isn’t much space for enthusiast developpers to tackle a different vision of a popular software.
So yeah, I agree with you, lots of janky software in Linux, but that’s the beauty of it IMO. If you stick to popular softwares, the jank is somewhat equivalent to Windows.


You’ve used Windows for so long that you don’t remember how it was when you first started using it.
This isn’t different than what you are doing with Linux. The flow gets better and better and you will acquire the experience needed to navigate the issues. It takes time, that’s all.
The documentation is usually dog shit.
The corporate culture does not allow appropriate time for the documentation as it is considered something that cost money without a quantifiable gain.
It permeates in the FOSS space as well since writing good documentation is a skill and it is not fostered in corporations. So devs start great projects with terrible documentation.
Same, and I use portainer to manage my docker compose stacks.
I can bring down a container without bringing down the whole stack of services.


Yeah, I opened the website thinkint it would be the github list with a better search, but it’s 95% AI crap


The cat is out of the bag and long gone.
People got used to the simplicity of centralized services, and corpos made great efforts to make everything 1-click.
So when the average users need to do more than 1-click, they won’t use the software.
It would help if anti-trust laws were applied and these mega-corpos got broken in a thousand pieces. Centralized monolith services would have a harder time to thrive and give space to federation/decentralization.


Capitalism has distilled its parasitic behaviour down to a science to suck the life out of anything that dare to stand out, and leave its corpse dry, for the sake of more profits.


Pogs are the civilized upgrade of throwing rocks together. Fuck yeah it should come back. It is ingrained in our DNA


Boring is ok for 95% of the things.


It is how its done today.
Every semi-big or big corpos gamble their money trying to be the one coming on top and capture the market.
So it is not surprising to see that.


I am not sure if it is still applicable, but with the 3-2-1 rule, that should work good enough. 3 copies of your data on two different medium with one off-site backup.
So the data with it’s local backup that is copied to an off site backup. Which is probably your case (I assume that your offsite backup is a copy of your local backup).
Agile was the cool new thing years back and has been abused and misused and now, pretty much every dev company force it on their team but do whatever the fuck they want.
Agile should have a lot of traditional project management but doesn’t because it became the MBA wet dream of metrics. And when metrics become the target, people will do whatever they need to do to meet the metrics instead of actually progressing the project.