HuddaBudda

Looks at the entirety of the internet

Oh no.

That is… hilarious.

No satire? Guess anything on the internet is out of the question then.

Engaging or providing subjective negative reviews

What do they think a review is?! If they wanted an advertisement, buy an ad spot on Google ya cheap bastards.

Did they just want to buy the IPs? Why throw Billions at video game development, only to cut out the development part?

I don’t know how one man can think he can do the output of 20% of his engineers.

We aren’t going to see another model Tesla after this are we?

Warning: Kids left unattended on this lawn will be fed to dinosaurs in the name of science.

Parents and dogs will be given popcorn and adequate seating.

Rule 3. Thou shalt not post thy IQ on the internet.

The guy who scored 167 at IQ test when he was a kid? Sadly logic does not follow emotion. If you want to argue back, then you need reason to be on your side.

Rule 26, If thou criticize communism thou needeth to do more then just question it.

Can you give me examples of socialism working?

Can you name at least one socialist nation that seek equity?

I know many people will shit on Kaiser for being a health insurance company, but as a person who has work through Cigna, UHC, Humana, Kaiser was the only health insurance that I felt people were being helped, had access to that help. With no hassles.

It’s a fucked up system, but kaiser was one of the few I would take a slap for. Everyone else can get shit on.

Thank you

Technically $56 billion.

Or in job terms, 466,667 jobs that pay $120,000 a year.

I couldn’t imagine being a software engineer for Telsa, pouring your heart and soul into making a good product.

And in your bosses’ drunken haze, gets to make an ass of himself on the world stage and get paid 1,000,000,000x your salary to do it.

Lose advertising investors, lose quality and face on the products you have to build. Still gets to be CEO of three failing companies

But your job is the one that gets canned to save the stock price.

Edit: loose

“I’ve often thought ‘I wish I could give these folks another $10 or $20 because it was worth more than my initial $70 and they didn’t try to nickel and dime me every second,’”

You know what, I could agree with that opinion if the irony wasn’t lost to folks

No. One. Would tip for a blizzard game.

1. Blizzard DOES nickel and dime you at every second. Literally.

2. Blizzard has not produced a good game since Overwatch 2.

3. Blizzard made 8.71 Billion in 2023. They can afford to pay their developers without relying on public donations.

I hear it has the same release schedule as Half Life 3, Knights of the old republic remake, and Road Runner vs. Acme.

The understandable difference being that a gun has but one purpose: Kill people.

Whereas everything else I have mentioned, including 3d printers are multi-purpose. Not intended to kill, but to serve multiple roles.

Though, it is a good point that few devices could be cobbled together to make infinite guns so long as you had material. So I am not saying it isn’t a class of it’s own, just where does the logic end with that point?

Is it only legal for a company to print guns? How does a license alone protect people? I don’t think that is something I could answer.

I think some people would say the ability to print a gun is more deadly then a knife.

But I kind of agree with you.

If we start licensing people to own stuff that has the potential to do harm, then eventually you are going to run into a never ending list of household items and laws of natural physics:

• Bleach
• Vinegar
• Salt
• Sugar
• Chlorine
• Gas
• Natural gas
• Methane
• Fertilizers
• Electricity
• Paper
• Fire
• Propane
• Etc.