Intentionally missing the point is not an argument in itself.

That’s not what you are doing at all. You are not laughing. Anti ai people are outraged, full of hatred and ready to pounce on anyone who isn’t as anti as they are. It’s a super emotional issue, especially on fediverse.

You may be confident, because you probably don’t know how software is built. Nobody is going to just abandon all the experience they have, vibe code something and release whatever. Thats not how it works.

I think people today, after having a year experience with ai know it’s capabilities reasonably well. My mother is 73 and it’s been a while since she stopped joking about what ai wrote to her that was silly or wrong, so people using computers at their jobs should be much more aware.

I agree about that llms are good at some things. They are great tools for what they can do. Let’s use them for those things! I mean even programming has benefitted a lot from this, especially in education, junior level stuff, prototyping, …

When using any product, a certain responsibility falls on the user. You can’t blame technology for what stupid users do.

Ok? So, what you are saying is that some lawyers are idiots. I could have told you that before ai existed.

No not really, just an observation. It literally said you are a boring person. Not sure whats not to get.

Bye.

Yeah, but … they also can’t just do nothing and possibly miss out on something. Especially if they already invested a lot.

That makes no sense. That has nothing to do with it. What are you on about.

That’s like watching tv and not knowing how it works. You still know what to get out of it.

Sure. But you can literally test almost all frontier models for free. It’s not like there is some conspiracy or secret. Even my 73 year old mother uses it and knows it’s general limits.

You don’t have to know about tokens to see what ai can and cannot do.

They are using it for every question. It’s pointless. The only reason they are doing it is to blow up their numbers.

… they are trying to be infront. So that some future ai search wouldn’t capture their market share. It’s a safety thing even if it’s not working for all types of questions.

Removed by mod

I don’t want to defend ai again, but it’s a technology, it can do some things and can’t do others. By now this should be obvious to everyone. Except to the people that believe everything commercials tell them.

I find it bizarre that people find these obvious cases to prove the tech is worthless. Like saying cars are worthless because they can’t go under water.

I think that’s really beautiful.

When I saw this, I though: what an old joke.

But no. It’s not.

It’s strange, but I’ve seen lots of comments that are not aware this is fake. The ai hater crowd is using it as their proof, the other side saying he is using it wrong.

Jesus effin Christ! I had no idea! This is madness! This is … Omfg I just can’t

Youre insults are so great that I know now you have bested me. Incredible debate strategy to ignore all the arguments and go straight for the jugular with personal attacks. Truly remarkable rhetorical capabilities! I salute you! Have a nice day. Bye.

Ah, there go the insults. Surely the best way to display the superiority of your argument lol. And show who is the rational one in any conversation. But I’ll let the first one side, ok. Anyone can have a weak moment. For sure I had many.

My post has sense. You can claim ,as you have, that multiple ingredients don’t guarantee a tasty dish and fair enough, but in the other hand the opposite is also obviously not true. So I claim that’s not an argument against what I said by logic itself. I can also say that’s not a good comparison. We have a technology that is already giving us results. You can claim they aren’t good, but considering how many people use it already, that by itself could refute that claim, without mentioning any case studies which are plenty.

To the meat of the thing. Maybe I can’t claim that we are headed for an ai nirvana, but the same you can’t say LLMs are in any kind of dead end, especially not one that will mean ai stagnation for the medium future. But I can safely claim we are far closer than we were 3 years ago, by many orders of magnitude. The reasons being exactly hardware and LLMs. And this is exactly the reason for investments in the very the same tech, infrastructure, companies, institutions, universities, (…), that would invent new technology in AI. So, in the worst case scenario for the llms, they have accelerated the investments and improved the infrastructure for future inventions. Worst case.

Got more insults?

Satirical? That didn’t fit the description of the word at all. Your should check a dictionary.

All technological branches invariably slow down? Ever heard of Moore’s law? I’m just gonna stop here and not talk to you again. It’s clear, you just want a conflict and I don’t think you have much else to offer. Bye.