

you did not read the article
Computers and the internet gave you freedom. Trusted Computing would take your freedom.
Learn why: https://vimeo.com/5168045


you did not read the article


plaintext is the unencrypted form of data. encryption produces ciphertext. encrypting the same data with the same key twice results in the same ciphertext, unless additional steps were taken to insert additional data that does not match (like a nonce) to the plaintext


the way it works is that the veracrypt container basically contains 2 encrypted partitions. if it can’t decrypt the first one with the password, it will try the second one, but always pretend to try both so that the time it takes to unlock it does not give it away. by writing to either, you risk overwriting data in the other one (except that you can input both the hidden and main partition passwords and it will make sure to keep the hidden partition unaffected), but otherwise both partitions are fully functional


deleted by creator


or just the individual characteristics and flaws of the lens/sensor/postprocessing software, some of which can be unique per device, and potentially comparable to other photos made with it.


or any repair show that uses the brand specific diagnostic software, pirated or not


They aren’t encrypted, hence why I never said they were.
you did, just with different words. without encryption and with centralized servers how would this claim of yours be the case?
If it’s a private group they don’t know what’s happening.
you know, trust and safety teams aren’t looking at the content with the apps when they look for harmful content. they have access to better moderation tools with access to the database, where the messages are readable to them because of the lack of end to end encryption.


the thread is visible here, just a single comment was deleted


what you speak of is certified android. but a vendor can sell android phones (not certified) without google services, and that is android.


which would be ridiculous because it is android just the same


Because Windows updates take long and cause downtime. Also forcing reboots is not great (though I dont know if they just do that if there was a real vulnerability, that would be fine)
and also the fear that whatever will break. I often hear that people are afraid of temporarily broken drivers, but also windows updates often reset (unknown!) settings, things like audio device IDs that matter for pro audio software and systemwide audio effects (think device specific EQ and filters).
but on linux the system updates your software too, which is then again, if you are doing something professionally on the system, you are almost guaranteed from time to time to come across bugs that are in the way
But I guess Windows updates are more stable than typical Linux updates, more tests etc.
It’s weird because it’s true even though the filesystem and updates are much better organised on Linux. I mean the weird part being that windows is that stable even with the chaos it does in its system files.


from what OP said I think the sites’ DRM blocks watching on linux. I mean, why wouldn’t they try the website?


And also, are you too lazy to update your system occasionally, which is a simple command or a few clicks? Because how is needing to click a few buttons every few weeks/months “bad UX”?
It’s not the point whether they do. the average people wouldn’t. that’s why it needs to be automatic, or why the easiest way should also do that.


What? Linux mint is based on Ubuntu because that is supposed to be the great distro.
mint is supposed to undo shit decisions of ubuntu
LMDE was reported to work way less well than regular Mint. But for sure that is a good path onwards.
I don’t get it either, LMDE is treated as a testing project by mint
Distros apply updates, and users should not need to press buttons and wait all the time.
distros should let the user be able to defer updates, but make them effortless to install. people complain about forced windows updates all the time and for good reasons.
did you see how kde plasma 6 does it nowadays? its on the shutdown button. that is the way.


There’s a “Cinnamon on Wayland (Experimental)” session for that. And also, installing a new DE.
why would you recommend an experimental DE to a newbie? it breaks in 2 weeks and all you hear is “linux from shit”. not even directly, but through a friend of a friend, because they won’t ask for your help again.
when I was looking at the viability of installing mint for common people, one of my criteria was to have kde plasma, because it’s user friendly and evolves relatively quickly, in a good way. a common theme I was reading that yeah it is possible to install it manually, but it’s less stable. I think I cannot afford the burden of taking upon the yech support for people and fixing an unsupported DE when it breaks, because it is complex software, with many moving parts that if the distro does not focus on always packaging correctly, if they don’t test it but only rely on users to report issues, then that won’t work reliably. If I want kde, I need a distro that takes it seriously and allows it as a default DE.


opensuse is ending slowroll. I had a pretty good experience with fedora kde edition though


I don’t think the average consumer knows about those issues. what makes you think they do?


“As the largest digital rights network in Europe, our position is firm: the use of spyware is inherently incompatible with fundamental rights, and therefore should be banned, as well as the market of private companies that are profiting from human rights violations.”
I hope these positions will also apply against chat control and any similar proposals


its here:
as I understood you are complaining that they don’t have a package manager. they do, but not for system software.