I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.

Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?

Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).

I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.

Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.

I imagine they have an embedded raspberry pi type computer in the screen itself.

I hear the new rotring 4 in 1 is pretty good, not as good as the original but it takes d1 refills so you can have a gel refill for smooth writing and a spacepen refill for writing on awkward things.

I can’t tell if this is supposed to be for or against glyphosate?

They also have to continually convince politicians and other politically minded people to give them money, and risk having it taken away if their results are politically inconvenient.

He did nothing wrong

Where is god going to get lawyers from? The other guy has them all.

More instances with minimal/no defederation would help. That way you can just tell people to pick one of those instances and it doesn’t matter which one.

It’s a bit of a faff to export and import your followed community list

Republican Machiavelli? Or deliberately giving terrible advice to princes Machiavelli?

Either way he really hated mercenaries.

Paywall free link https://archive.ph/TYd4L

Again? They forgot to tell the Serbs the F117 was invisible

In the past the military would’ve had to pay an actress to pretend to be a bridge bunny.

we have microplastics instead now.

It’s fine as long as you don’t do something silly like invite a journalist to your top secret government group chat.