As a rule, files never get deleted… They get over written. So it depends on whether that process has happened to any loose images.

Honestly, you don’t have to do much to villainize some aspects of industrial farming. It’s mostly only possible due to the haber-bosch nitrogenation process, which was invented by the same guy who invented chemical warfare, and the process itself uses lots of petrochemicals and dumps a lot of nitrogen into the natural environment. That’s not even getting into the use of migrant workers, or the patenting of dna over some crops, and the food monopolies that exist in some countries.

I also don’t think it’s a case of “there can be only one system”… And I don’t run into a lot of people saying that.

For myself, this isn’t one of the more pressing issues in the world. I don’t really think people have enough land to be able to be self-sufficient, but gardening is a nice hobby.

Food markets vary from nation to nation, and have political aspects I’m fairly disinterested in, so can’t really comment on that.

Bye!

Assuming it used all the same tools and techniques, making only minor replacements of tractors for voluntary domestic labor … I don’t see why it couldn’t reach averages in a similar magnitude. Given them larger plots where they could use industrial tools and they should produce about the same on average.

Eother way there attempts more self sufficiency are to be commended… So the I’m not sure of the point of the post really.

If we had a socialist style of market economy like Vietnam we’d produce more crops.

Also in a correctly valued economy we wouldn’t have to subsidize farming.

I failed maths, but I’m great at logic, which I consider to be the more important proficiency for programming.

I suspect that the mass extinction was caused by 4chans alt-right phase… And perhaps even earlier in the atheism+ and gamer gate periods.

I wonder whether evolutionary memetics will ever be a field of study. I guess know your meme and internet archives are all we have of a proto-discipline so far.

Relative to much of the world yes.

In terms of economics and neoliberalism mostly.

You’re more right than wrong.

In terms of social liberalism, the differences between the two parties are more noticeable.

This is because structural politics is defined by undemocratic means, interests, and forces.

So we vote on more superficial aspects, such as the culture war and social rights.

Which can be important, but most of the time aren’t the real meat of the world’s problems.

Progressives also disappoint me. The public not being Social Democrats is my main issue.

These guys look like they wanna eat each other’s skin clean off. I ain’t trusting anything coming from them.

Unfortunately the technology will also be used for creating new weapons of war.

deleted by creator

Philosophy? That’s specifically Abraxas from Gnostic Christianity, so more about theology than Philosophy.

Abraxas (or Abracax) was an anguipede (a deity represented with snake feet) pagan God of “Asian theogonies” with a “rooster’s head, dragon’s feet and a whip in his hand”.

“The bird fights its way out of the egg. The egg is the world. Who would be born must first destroy a world. The bird flies to God. That God’s name is Abraxas.”

Confused gay fascist who is more than likely a white nationalist, Peter Thiel.

Technically everything would just freeze in place for 24 hours and then start again. No one would notice to the point this could be happening all the time and we’d be none the wiser.

Just make star wars universe live action Rick and Morty but crucially WITHOUT Rick and Morty.

28, all the gay porn, yiff/furry, and male anatomy ones that I’ve caught while browsing c/all.

No.

Engineering is more of a practice, maths is more of a tool, theology is at best the study of the history of cults and brainwashing…

…so there’s really only one science here.

Your comment about current models, known energy types, and universal pixels seems to ignore the post’s topic (which isn’t really about known models or energy types).

A better way to disregard the post would be to just point out that solar systems aren’t that big in terms of scales of the universe, and that there’s no indication of any charges, electrons, or valance layers about.

Or just reject planck length and all other dimensional limitations like it. Then you can have turtles universes all the way down.