✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.
Other Lemmy account at https://lemmy.ml/u/arsCynic because Beehaw is blocking a bit too much from the outside world for my taste.
So how can I as a new user make sure to have the most secure machine as possible?
⚜︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.
Anything that touches greed-incentivizing cr*ptocurrencies turns to shit. Use Matrix, XMPP, or Tox instead.
✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.
Ah, well, good thing your feeling is more important than any potential source of actual data.
That’s not at all what it says; sarcasm is uncalled for.
I feel like ⅒ is a gross overestimation and regular search engines should consume at least 100 times less than GPTs.
“Ecofeminists examine the effect of gender categories in order to demonstrate the ways in which social norms exert unjust dominance over women and nature. The philosophy also contends that those norms lead to an incomplete view of the world, and its practitioners advocate an alternative worldview that values the earth as sacred, recognizes humanity’s dependency on the natural world, and embraces all life as valuable.” —https://www.britannica.com/topic/ecofeminism
Yes. Because it goes hand in hand with Cynicism, my main guiding philosophy:
Cynic: “an adherent of an ancient Greek school of philosophers who held the view that virtue is the only good and that its essence lies in self-control and independence” —Merriam-Webster
Also doesn’t deserve Twitter, now known as a letter owned by a Gestapo enthusiast.
Either:
This “magic” requires a certain dose of privilege to be enjoyed. Fairly certain nearly everyone has the cognitive potential to do so, but unless we tax the rich, not the potential privilege.
✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.
Chuckled loudly, but couldn’t resist checking its veracity:
Why are fossilized hairs so rare?
“[…] The rarity might be explained by feathers and hair containing different types of the protein keratin, which may impact the likelihood of fossilization. However, the study notes that the lack of hair samples could have nothing to do with fossilization, and be explained by the collecting behavior of paleontologists, with a single feather usually being much easier to identify than a single hair. […]” —https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/09/170907142722.htm
✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.
Remember … with great power comes … something.
Hemorrhoids.
House dust mite: I poop on your face while you sleep.
Did the lord’s work myself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPw9dSV6y2c
What the hell happened to the ant? My god I dislike cliffhangers.
“Ambition is overrated. Whether a janitor or surgeon, being virtuous is what matters [1]. Avoid contempt and envy because we each have our part to play [2], powerless to choose our upbringing. Often there’s more than meets the eye so hold off on passing judgement. Everything is borrowed [3], so avoid craving credit too. The meaning of life is sharing (and) laughter [4], helping each other through peaks and throughs. Bref, GLHF.
[Quoting my own website arscyni.cc because POSSE: “Publish (on your) Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere.”]
TL;DR: It’s worth whatever a greater fool is willing to pay for it.
Bitcoin is a cult, therefore it’s invaluable to the cult members. In reality they’re all multi-level marketing pyramid schemes which is what the stock market has degenerated into as well. The former just has more overtly obnoxious shady unethical proponents. It’s easier to succumb to greed, selfishness, and seclude oneself from the rest of society by simply buying something that confirms one’s fallacy riddled beliefs than it is to question oneself and actively improving society with all of Earths inhabitants, ecosystems, and posterity in mind. Technologically humankind has made great strides, but mentally the majority still thinks like cavemen.
Crypto Cult Science
“Money corrupts; bitcoin corrupts absolutely. Disregarding all of bitcoin’s shortcomings, a financial instrument that brings out the worst in people—greed—won’t change the world for the better.” —https://www.arscyni.cc/file/crypto_cult_science.html
Changed my mind. Thanks.
For f*&% sake, I’m using JPEG XL on my website for some high res images that are amazingly well compressed using it, and especially to reduce the repository size on Codeberg. Only now discovered that only my niche main browser, Zen, renders them. What a stupid decision; their compression of high quality images is superior. Perfect to use alongside AVIF which does better in low quality images and illustrations and the like, or PNG which is best at preserving images containing text such as screenshots.