Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.

If you aren’t allowed to freely use data for training without a license, then the fear is that only large companies will own enough works or be able to afford licenses to train models.

If you order from Best Buy then presumably your contract is with them and not Door Dash. Though I guess you need to check the T’s and C’s to know what you agreed to…

Since it’s processed on device they don’t (necessarily) need to transmit and store your conversations in some central location. I guess theoretically this could be done in a secure way.

Yes. It’s clickbait because it doesn’t tell you the name of the game.

Tape

*digital license agreements

I think you need a forest, a pulp mill, and a paper mill. The forest might be the hardest part in a lot of places…

Does getting ready to click on something count at user input?

I don’t think you are allowed to sell patent infringing products, even if you didn’t make them. The manufacturers may not be in the US so going after them could be more complex. I believe patents restrict rights to make, use, or sell.

As long as you have enough monitors for all the spreadsheets and wiki pages you need to consult!

No Candy Crush? Non-starter.

We need to grind for a sense of pride and accomplishment.

Imagine hiring a taxi without having your lawyer review the terms and conditions, lol

What is intelligence though? Maybe I’m getting through life just by being pretty good at predicting what to say or do next…

Likely depends on your definition of AI. Most of the replies seem to be about LLMs… But there are many other possible uses of machine learning for business… Forecasting trends in sales, customer churn prediction etc. Entirely depends on your business.

But you have to select if it was human or not, right? So if you can’t tell, then you’d expect 50%. That’s different than “I can tell, and I know this is a human” but you are wrong… Now that we know the bots are so good, I’m not sure how people will decide how to answer these tests. They’re going to encounter something that seems human-like and then essentially try to guess based on minor clues… So there will be inherent randomness. If something was a really crappy bot then it wouldn’t ever fool anyone and the result would be 0%.

Right, but that would be fine because they’d have so much money from subscriptions at that point…

How much could a tweet cost? $10?

This sounds like the Pomodoro technique… There are a lot of apps for that.