“And I think that that’s going to be just very exciting for the…”
Plebs? He almost slipped lol
“And I think that that’s going to be just very exciting for the…”
Plebs? He almost slipped lol
The harm to people flying in private jets is much more important than spam links. According to their own “Oversight Board”.
I think your first paragraph only applies to US or US-like countries. I learned how to navigate unregulated Internet to download most things I could fit, and then expanded into more technical knowledge as I grew up. I know of the things you said in your first paragraph now, but I did not grow up beside them to have learned what I know today, or even what I knew back then. These computers were expensive (for us?) at first, so very few people had them, and then a few years later they were more abundant and easier for us to even have a chance to learn about them.
Maybe what they’re really saying is " you guys are fine with them doing it but not us!??"
A true visionary. Thank you for your contributions to the local network that benefinutted from those actions 🤘
“[T]he court finds that, by reproducing the content of the works (books) in dispute, without the consent of the authors, there has been a violation of the patrimonial copyright of the plaintiffs,” the Court of Appeals added.
You know what else reproduces the content of the works, with or without consent from the authors, a… Monitor. All those filthy pirates using monitors to read their pirated books. 🤮 They should sue the monitor manufacturers. Hell, they should sue Microsoft too, for also reproducing the pirated content and allowing them to hit “save” 😡
I agree, lol. I will let my wife know. I don’t know how she did this with a mouse, in Paint
😂💪🦆
That’s a good one, I 100% see YouTube complying with those takedown requests if they try.
Will they sue people who wake up from using the alarm clock because these people would be making money (their job) from the effects of this alarm clock (waking up)?
Harm? That is what would happen to their company if they explained what they meant by “harm”
🤣🤣 literally the only reaction to this!!
I agree, that phrase seems to be a little misleading with the “trust in God” crowd because to them, that is the ultimate answer, and no other answer would come close to being “right”. But “trust the science” is not meant to be the ultimate answer, just a sign pointing you in the right direction, so that you can then check the science to see if it’s reliable. So, the science that you’re trusting is not theirs, but yours.
That cat woke him up one day so he could continue writing his paper. He deserves his contribution.
Then Alphabet will come up with a new bullshit idea, “remove the limits for ‘trusted’ advertisers” so that they can inject more code than allowed as long as they keep paying for their ad “partnership”
And ask them about the difficulty of their poop, and to give it a rating between 3 and 13.
That show is a gold mine. Pun not intended but VERY welcome lol.