| Pronouns | he/him |
| Datetime Format | RFC 3339 |
- 9 Posts
- 673 Comments
Moralities aside, some find it liberating to stop caring what is & isn’t considered “weird.” Conformity definitely has its advantages, but at least consider the possibility that, for you, it may not be worth the costs. Take it from Al, or DEVO themselves for that matter.
As for morality, I’m not really a fan of it in its conventional senses. Philosophy prof. Hans-Georg Moeller, author of The Moral Fool: A Case for Amorality.
13·1 day agoIt’s bigger than it looks: our data is spread across 64,000 worksheets.
Our “big data” is
ActiveSheet.Rows.Countbig.
2·2 days agoI don’t think this concern is justified in most cases, but I’m not really in position to argue. If this were a common problem, I think I’d have heard about it, but outside of the occasional sensationalist news piece or Hollywood/TV thriller, I haven’t.
I do know an old joke, though: Before visiting a foreign country, it’s important to memorize three phrases in the local language:
- Where is the restroom?
- How much is it for one night?
- Power to the people! I support your revolution!
I don’t know what a “treat monster nature” is. I haven’t traveled much outside the core, so I can’t speak to this first-hand, but my impression is that most of the world is mostly a safe place to visit. There aren’t a lot of places that are going to punish you for renting hotel rooms and eating at restaurants as an American. Most people around the world know how to distinguish between America the empire and a civilian American spending money into the local economy.
I don’t fully understand your question, and I doubt that I’m qualified to answer, because I have virtually every privilege, and I’ve never thought about international travel but from my own easy mode perspective.
You say “travel the world,” but where realistically will you travel? Westerners tend to travel almost exclusively to other imperial core countries and to popular tourist spots in the periphery that cater to imperial core tourists.
3·2 days agoYes? “Consciously” and “knowingly” would be synonyms in the context.
This is the ideal tech worker. You may not like it, but this is what peak technology looks like.
Counterpoint: knowingly taking risks is valid and sometimes even necessary.
Nobody reads the community rules or pinned posts :(
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Open a laser tag center or a car wash.
Because we are social animals? Someone should create c/AskStonerLemmy 😂
NPR is state media, and who runs the state? The capitalist class.
The fact that the Electoral College was determined to be more important than the people’s votes was shameful.
Huh? First of all the Electoral College has never not been the basis for presidential elections, and second of all that election had nothing to do with the Electoral College. It had to do with hanging chads, Florida governor Jeb Bush, and the Supreme Court.
The rise of the megacorps was in the late 19th century as imperialism, otherwise known as “monopoly capitalism” or the Highest Stage of Capitalism.
The stage we’re in now is a further advancement known as neocolonialism, which began in the mid-20th century. You might say that neoliberalism and the rise of neoclassical economic hegemony are closely related to neocolonialism.