And how’s that working out?

Unless the lid is thermally bonded to the CPU or GPU, it’s unlikely to be contributing much. And if that is the case, there must be places you can add ventilation.

You’ll never get good balance with that case as you’ve explained yourself.

If you can, remove the lid and run like that, or I’d be cutting big holes in it until it’s just a chassis. If you have cats/kids and need it protecting, maybe put it in a normal PC case. I’ve run a lot of machines naked and they breathe a lot better.

His line seems to be ‘don’t submit shit code.’

And he’s been 100% consistent with that since the start.

Even if you didn’t play his levels, you will certainly have played levels inspired by his flow.

Pioneers in computing and gaming have left a hell of a legacy.

Windows still dominates the market,

What market?

Desktops? Sure.

Servers? Definitely not.

Supercomputers? Like, none of them.

Thanks for the tldr; As a semantic argument I agree with the first commenter in the article, it goes too far.

Managers sometimes refer to their employees as tools, and they don’t fully control them either. Plenty of more cleanly defined tools (explosives, guns, chemicals) can have unintended consequences if used without proper controls, training or care.

I used the term “AI is a tool” at a meeting yesterday, and I will again.

(Minor grumble: Eww, Linkedin. Having visited the site again I know I’ll get a bunch more spam and targetted adverts for a few weeks)

That confirms it, Omarchy is the official operating system of bigots.

One of the few stories around that paints Anthropic in a good light. Looks like they did what they were required to and potentially saved lives.

How many flaws does this add?

Thanks for adding the model ranges, @IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz

Lenovo has pimped out the Thinkpad name ever since they bought it from IBM. Whilst some thinkpads are still durable (the business class especially) they also slap the name on some very poorly made laptops. Worth spending time researching models rather than just assuming every thinkpad is built like they used to be.

We use framework, and they are very good and I like them a lot. (Noting OP explicitly excludes them though)

But I wouldn’t say they’re particularly durable. The chassis has some flex in it and we’ve had two screens fail out of 30 without being particularly abused.

But of course, parts are available and repairs are very easy, so there’s that.

Omarchy is Hannah Montana Linux for bigots.

OP doesn’t say they bought it, only it’s coming to them.

I suspect it’s entirely grift motivated. There’s obviously going to be a takedown so owner is likely going to earn what they can and then bail the second X’s lawyers send a cease and desist. I can’t see any honest or altruistic motivation to do this.

If this affects European users then the GDPR does make it a crime.

Same.

Clickbait article seems to be (poorly) written about people who are unhappy rather than people in IT. Some overlap doesn’t equate to totality, and you’ll find the same in every profession.

deleted by creator

Yes, absolutely. Good point.

Interesting question.

I think not, on the grand scale. Whilst yes, it would vastly outclass other tanks, you’re forgetting about the adaptability and inventiveness of humans. I believe they would find a way to disable it fairly quickly - after all, WW2 was a constant stream of one fighting unit encountering new technology - Allies had nothing like the German Railgun for example, but it had little influence in the outcome. Also, like the Tirpiz, something like this could become a liability. It would become such a target that it would tie up a huge amount of resources protecting it. Modern tanks are still vulnerable in many ways - even from as simple a thing as just digging a hole in the ground and covering it with branches caveman style.