Some are and some aren’t. Like a lot of folks on here are here because reddit went to shit.

how can the Fediverse grow without loosing its soul in the process?

It can’t? Rather obvious that the “soul” of a community is defined by it’s members and the bigger the community the more mainstream this soul will become. Maybe the federation mechanic offers some solutions here, but that remains to be seen.

Gives me stuff from months ago.

I need a proper controversial sort option. I want to know where the juice is.

We haven’t figured out how to deal with social media at all. We will make even worse mistakes with AI, that’s just how we are as humans.

So more or less the same as with human interactions.

Kevin Spacey probably wasn’t acting as he often portrayed psychopathic characters in TV and films.

Good example, him “acting” bad guys kind of even gets an extra layer of morbid interest to the film. But I would totally understand other actors not wanting to work with him anymore. Have no idea who the other guys are.

I enjoy actors for their work as actors not for them being good people.

I think it’s German slipping in. Thanks for feedback.

You got it, I just happen to have quite some friends from south and middle America and since it was important to them and make sense to me I took it over in my vocabulary.

Honestly, anyone who can speak a second language has a better grasp of what a noun and an adjective are than yer average English speaker.

Why?

I would argue that US-americans are native speakers of US-American english, which is a bit different from english spoken in england.

In English “a male” and “a female” is almost exclusively reserved for animals.

But also important to remember that quite a bunch of people are note native speakers without the feeling for finer distinctions in meaning. Like for me, since I learned english mostly in a scientific setting, those words habe little negative connotation on their own. They became negative co-notated through the use of misogynistic communities.

Iframes with more iframes inside.

And people are often governed or motivated by ideas.

Sultan Mehmed II

That’s the dude who fought Dracula? Didn’t know he was involved with enlightenment any sources to read up on it?

Somebody really passionate about it has to make one and not sell it or make it publicly tradable? Which would be difficult since the market is rather full (I would guess). Also dating can be just a miserable experience if one lacks self esteem and does not fit into societal expectations of desirability - that’s not on dating app problem.

Who ever started the whole enlightenment thing, with the idea that there is no god and we are responsible for our self.

The problem, like with a lot of stuff, ist that they are for profit and optimized in a way to maximize profit over the actual functionality.

Sexuality is tightly connected to societal taboos, as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult - it’s no-one else businesses. There is no need or benefit in moralizing peoples sexuality.