It’s just dd with extra flags enabled for data recovery.

Not when it’s pointing out another failure by Zuckyboy

This kinda sounds like the last GRDS hack maybe? Would need some proof to even say if this is new.

Your link doesn’t work, but just from the looks of it, you have a volume that is already attached to a VM, and you’re trying to use it elsewhere?

Plasma Bigscreen is kind of a mess still, so maybe run it on something first to understand what you’re getting into. That being said, any distro that runs KDE can run KBS, but will probably not be tuned for the least amount of resources to be used.

Something like OpenELEC/LibreELEC or OSMC are very well tuned for this, and require very little in the way of resources though. I’m not saying DON’T use KBS, but if you’re lacking in resources, the others are probably a better choice.

I’ve had the same one of these for almost a decade now, and it still looks brand new: MyWalit

Low profile, fantastic stitching, and great leather.

Literally what we are saying. I don’t think we are understanding what you’re trying to reinforce.

I’m not sure if you mean “trust” as in a handshake or not, but that’s not what we’re talking about about. At larger scales, everything is done in written contracts, strictly. Shit rolls DOWNhill if those are not airtight, and that’s when lawsuits kick off.

Not true. I’ve been involved in litigation with both AWS and Google over unsecured comms that were defined as being TLS secured in SLA/SLO contracts and found not to be. Not that anything nefarious was happening necessarily, but the expectation is clear.

Whether these asshats even check for such requirements with a Musk run company right now 🤷

It COULD possibly be that they are logging every exchange happening at the network fabric between the service layers, but nobody knows unless they intentionally take steps to investigate or accidentally prove it.

See here

Then if you want to lock that specific version, go to /etc/pacman.conf and add the base package name to the ignore list so it doesn’t just go and get updated on the next upgrade run.

Generally no, because most hosting companies would have something baked into SLA/SLO contracts, but all of this shit is done so illegally and shadily now, I wouldn’t put a hard “no” on that possibility.

Also handy heard anything like that. Supporting info appreciated.

Not even the same thing. They’re not stupid. They know people are going to use it. EMBRACING it would be more like adding AI nonsense tools wherever they can, and rely on automated systems that are based on LLMs to contribute code, which is not what’s happening here.

Debian isn’t “ambracing AI”? Where’d you get that?

Ubuntu has been making plays in that direction. Not the same thing.

WHOA. Bombastic claim there, brah.

He’s a Eugenics aficionado, and racist-ADJACENT

Hard to take anything these morons take seriously. I’d need to see some receipts to even half believe this isn’t the setup to declare an emergency in an attempt to delay or deny the midterm outcomes.

If it’s just a modem with no WiFi, then it’s not capable of this specific thing.

That’s what they are deploying. This has been possible for awhile, but has recently gotten much creepier: https://groundy.com/articles/wifi-densepose-full-body-tracking-through-walls-using-your/

Nope: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wi-fi-routers-used-to-detect-human-locations-poses-within-a-room

It’s gotten even more capable where it can basically act as a presence sensor through walls as well. It’s not simple device tracking at all.

Yes, but as I said, on a 4GB budget, this matters quite a bit. I run thousands of edge devices on a custom distro with similar constraints, and it adds up quickly. It’s not that it’s insurmountable or anything, but I’m answering the question asked and not getting into the particulars. It’s just a known fact.