Worst one I’ve seen: username and password plus a 2FA email, BUT if you hit enter instead of clicking the last button it refreshes the page.

The way it’s been developed, I’d call it more a superfund site.

Value in the abstract sense of “desirable thing” not necessarily monetary.

If I’m having a conversation within and ask them about a thing, I’d much rather an “I don’t know” than whatever the plagiarism engine’s facsimile of an opinion is.

Lot of people have strong opinions about ai, many of them very bad. Because what should be a novelty or maybe a part of a more sophisticated system instead of the half assed implementation that it currently is. At the low low price of stealing from artists and fucking the environment.

Ok. But the context is that of a conversation. Where is the value sharing there?

What value is it adding at any point? If I wanted to use chat gpt, I’d go off myself.

I feel like most people with a new Windows installation aren’t going to know that one.

People installing firefox or chrome.

Assuming it’s not for people or animals, enjoy your pit. Make sure you put supports in.

I have one that I used to use with my PC (switched to linux and it’s a pain in the ass to do is why I stopped). I would still have to log in to start the app to hook to my PC.

I’m also in camp sequel, though I could be persuaded to camp squirrel.

I’m curious how you’d characterize yourself then

It’s not a meaningful contribution. Judging someone in person, sure. Judging someone when you have a platform people pay attention to, yeah. Random comment on Lemmy? No one gives a shit. I fully recognize my own pointlessness in all this, especially this far down in the comments.

My mistake. I believed you to be proposing a solution to the evil proposed. Not idly judging people with no meaningful contribution toward making things better.

You seem to believe that I think it a justification for evil. I do not, people should not do such things and they are shitty people for doing them.

I’m saying that the idea of some good people doing the right thing fixing the problem is naive and doomed to failure and a real solution to the problem has to be bigger than the lazy “just no one be evil” proposition you seem into to champion.

No. That putting the onus of change on individuals is a losing proposition. The incentives have to change or no number of good people will fix it. I hear the French have had very effective solutions in the past.

It’s a big company. Someone’s going to play.

Oh yeah. It was a shit project. Fucking nightmare.

I did a little “is shit rotting in your fridge?, also inventory” thing for senior design. It was a cursed project for a variety of reasons, but even what we did was a stretch in terms of utility.

If only we had known that the girl that came up with the idea was actively detrimental to everything she was even adjacent to

You know that large groups can pursue more than one thing at a time right?

I was with you to the last paragraph. While dentistry does have a high suicide rate from what I remember, you’re making a lot of assumptions about a person whom we only know that their parents are rich and they did well in school.

That’s what they said.