mathemachristian[he]

You can block instances

I think talking with his boss, your boss and HR (possibly all in one meeting) sounds like a reasonable first step.

Talk about the nuclear option!! That’s a meeting HR calls in when someone is about to get fired!!

I think talking with your boss would be the best thing if talking with Noisy Guy directly is not something you think is feasible. That would be the first step to escalation, talking to someone elses boss or human resources directly is typically frowned upon I believe since corporations have a very hierarchical structure and stepping outside of that is very uncommon. If enough people talk to your boss about it they might be able to escalate it further, if it’s a demonstrably sufficiently large problem (i.e. it affects ROI somehow) then it might get escalated up to someone who is directly above Noisy Guy and can do something about it.

HR isn’t really for interpersonal problems, it is the branch of the corporation that deals with the legalese of having people in employ. I. e. Hiring/firing, wage payment and issues, vacation days etc. anything that (potentially) touches upon legal issues. If you have anything protected under law then that’s HR’s job. But even then, “troublemakers”, for example people filing complaints about illegal sexual harassment, should be aware that the company’s interest is to it’s profit line first and will only do as much as it can be prosecuted for. If they have to fire the harasser they will, but that’s a loss on their part and if they believe that this could be recurring problem with the victim they’d rather terminate the victims employment to mitigate their loss. HR’s primary concern is shielding the corporation from legal harm and they care about your work environment only in as much as it affects your output. So if employing you is more trouble than it’s worth, you’re gone.

Exceptions, variations apply of course and are typically tied to the corporations size.

My approach, depending on your boss, talk to them about how it’s affecting you personally if they’re amiable to you. If they like you they might relate and want to solve it because people like helping each other, but give them something about how it hurts collective performance so they can argue why this problem needs a solution to their higher ups. Know your and your colleagues works worth. If what you produce is absolutely vital to the companies success then wham bam they should be out of there. If you are easily replaced, you need to be a bit more diplomatic. As always there is more power in collective bargaining than individual.

Türkçe not gendered (at all, everyone and everything is “o”) and one of the easiest languages to learn

Economy and social liberties are not independent axes. The mode of production of a society influences it’s social life and the liberties afforded.

Tan is the tao out of which the sin and cos arise

People fed up with the the (false) sin/cos dichotomy and want to get people to use tan more often.

Ornamental Charlie Kirk Memorial Fountain

The store pulls its own profits in by how many people shop there and part of that profit, is distributing to those who work there.

No, profit by definition is what’s left after all the expenses, including wages. Your wages are completely independent of profit and only dependent on the market value of your laborforce. The store could be raking in huge amounts of profits, if the competition among the laborers is fierce, wages will be minimal. Or the other way around, profit margins could already be razor thin, but if the competiton among the laborers is minimal then wages have to be high if they want to attract laborers.

Please read “wage labor & capital” where it’s all spelled out if you want to learn more. (It’s a short read)

Shoplifting only hurts corporate since it eats into the profits which are independent of the wage.

the thing I’m seeing commonly are angry people calling normal people “fascists”, so then can kick them out of projects or groups

Name one such instance. How did you know the people accused weren’t fascists and why would their accusers do that?

That’s like saying, “A community in lemmy has lots of users that come from X anarchist instance, so that Community must now be anarchist!”

This argument doesn’t work for anarchism since anarchists don’t invade spaces like that but it absolutely works for fascism.

Sorry dont really have time to get into it, tldr its a us defense company (which makes it already fascist) but also pro-trump (so its openly fascist) read more in this thread as well: https://lemmy.ml/post/36786640

Also quite the gall to assert that “not everything that you dislike = fascism” when you don’t even know the main reason why people are calling it fascist

It has ties to the fascist company “Anduril”, how is it not fascist?

Removed by mod

They were literally lynching soldiers of the PLA, that shit had to be stopped.

principal_skinner.jpeg

whenever I asked about something in irc I got fairly swift and very helpful responses 🤷

educate yourself instead of revelling in your own ignorance

no it isn’t, non-guix is right there and only one line in the right file

Probably for the best 🤣