

As far as I know, there is no programmatic way to destroy an existing pizza. terraform destroy is implemented on the client side, by consuming the pizza.


As far as I know, there is no programmatic way to destroy an existing pizza. terraform destroy is implemented on the client side, by consuming the pizza.
I have a sticker of the nix one on a laptop.


have you looked at solutions which emulate github actions locally?
https://github.com/nektos/act this is one of them but I think I’ve seen one more.
Github actions also has self hosted runners: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/concepts/runners/self-hosted-runners


What would you use if you had a choice?


This is the same technology that lets people play windows games on android with good performance. Because there is not direct access to the GPU, they have to use GPU virtualization in order to get it access to a Linux proot that runs wine inside.
I’m excited to see it being used and developed in other areas.


design around ease of self-hosting. A non technical user must be able to self host easily and at a very low cost.
This may be a controversial opinion, but I actually like the way that hosting a lemmy instance is somewhat difficult to spin up. I like the way that it is requires a time investment and spammers can’t simply spin up across different domain names. I like the way that problematic instances get defederated and spammers or other problematic individuals can’t simply move domain names due to the way activitypub is tied to those.
In theory, you could set up something like digitalocean’s droplets, where a user does one click to deploy an app like nextcloud or whatever. But I’m not really eager to see something like that.
Transferable user identity (between instances)
I dislike this for a similar reason, tbh. If someone gets banned, they should have to start over. Not get to instantly recreate and refederate all their content from a different instance.
Of course, ban evasion is always a thing. But what I like is that spammers or problematic individuals who had their content nuked are forced to start from scratch and spend time recreating it before they get banned again.
As for what I would really like to see, I would really love features that make lemmy work as a more powerful help forum. Like, on discourse if you make a post, it automatically searches for similar posts and shows them to you in order to avoid duplicate posts. Lemmy does something similar, but it appears to only be the title. It would also be cool to automatically show relevant wiki pages, or FAQ content, since one of the problems on reddit was that people wouldn’t read the wiki or FAQ of help forums.
I would also like the ability to mark a comment on a post as an “answer”, or something similar. I think stackoverflows model definitely had lots of issues with mods incorrectly marking things as duplicate, but I think it was a noble goal to try to ensure that questions were only asked once, and for them to accumulate into a repository of knowledge. For the all the complaints about it, stackoverflow is undeniably the one of the biggest and most useful repositories of knowledge.


There does exist a tool that does it. The creator posted about it on the fediverse. It only supported ubuntu at the time but looked extremely promising.
I cannot remember it’s name. :/
Maybe it’s linixify? But I remember seeing a post on lemmy with a youtube demo?


unless the SSD stopped working but then it is reasonable to expect it would no accept partitioning
This happened to me. It still showed up in kde’s partition manager (when I plugged the ssd into another computer), with the drive named as an error code.


What about the f droid version?
My recommendation is meetup and a website for advertising purposes. Meetup is frustrating, yes, but at the same time it’s where I have found almost all the linux and tech groups near me.


Familiarity instead of compatibility.
This piece of documentation from forgejo, about how their actions are mostly github actions compatible is how I feel about this or similar endeavors.
I really like KDE, because it’s familiar enough to Windows users that they can just kinda use it. Many of the shortcuts are the same. But I’ve had a bad experience with things that try to emulate Windows more completely, because people begin to expect some windows idiosyncracy or some other thing to be there. And then they get frustrated when it’s not the same.
KDE manages to be “close enough”, which results in a better experience.
Gnome used to much worse when it comes to ram usage, so the inertia of those sentiments still carry.
Kde used to be much worse, using what gnome uses now, but now kde has similar ram usage to xfce last time I tested. CPU wise it’s still much worse though.


I’ve heard of thumbnails being used to deliver malware.
You’ve heard of critical vulnerabilities in media processing applications that mean that thumbnails can theoretically be used to be spread malware. That is not the same as “this issue was being actively exploited in the wild and used to spread malware before it was found and patched”.
These vulnerabilities, (again, cost money), and are fixed rapidly when found. Yes, disabling thumbnails is more secure. But I am of the belief that average users should not worry about any form of costly zero day in their threat model, because they don’t have sensitive information on their computers that makes them a target.


less distro-dependent like a privilege escalation attack
These also are valuable. Less valuable than browser escapes IMO though.
A keylogger is more likely, and it’s just as possible with sudo as it is with run0. They would replace sudo, run0, doas, etc with a fake command (since that only require access to the user), that either keylogs, or inserts a backdoor while it does the other sudo things.
I’ve heard a fair few times about thumbnailer attacks, but no real detail from KDE about what if any mitigations they have in place.
Please ignore the entire cybersecurity hype news cycle about images being used to spread malware. They often like to intentionally muddy the waters, and not clearly explain the difference between a malformed file being used as a vulnerability to exploit a code execution exploit, and an image file being used as a container for a payload (steganography). The former is a big deal, the latter is a non issue because the image is not the issue, whatever means the malware actually used to get onto the systems is.
Here’s a recent example of me calling this BS out. The clickbait title implies that users got pwned by viewing a malicious image, when in actually it was a malicious extension that did the bad things.
Unless you are using windows media player, the microsoft office suite, or adobe acrobat, code execution from loading a media file is a really big deal and fixed extremely quickly. Just stay updated to dodge these kind of issues.
As for zero days, unknown and unpatched vulnerabilities, again, that’s a different threat model because those exploits cost money to execute. Using an existing known (but fixed in updated versions of apps) is free.


If I uninstall sudo and switch to run0 (
Sudo and run0 are both problematic. Sudo is a setuid binary, which is problematic, but run0 is not much better. It works by making calls to systemd/polkit/dbus, services that constantly run as root, and they themselves expose a massive attack surface. Many privilege escalation CVE’s similar to sudo have been released that exploit that attack surface.
When it comes to actually being secure, systemd somewhat screws you over, due to having a massive attack surface, a way to run things as root, and the interesting decision to have polkit parse and run javascript in order to handle authorization logic (parsing is a nightmare to do securely).
The other thing, is that the browser sandbox is much, much stronger than the separation of privileges between users in Linux. Browser sandbox escapes (because they work the same on windows or Linux) are worth immense amounts of cash, and are the kinds of exploits that are used in targeted manners against people who have information on their computer worth that much. If you don’t have information worth millions of dollars on your computer, you shouldn’t worry about browser sandbox escape exploits.
The reality is that any attacker who is willing and able to pierce through a browser sandbox, will probably also have a Linux privilege escalation vulnerability on hand. In my opinion, trying to add more layers to security is pointless unless you are adding stronger layers. If your attacker has a stronger “spear”, it doesn’t matter how many weak “shields” you try to put in front to stop it.
If the million dollar industry of browser escapes is in your threat model, I recommend checking out the way that Openbsd’s sandboxing interacts with chromium. Or check out google’s gvisor sandbox and see if you can run a browser in there.


Late reply but I also recommend going through flathub for screenwriting apps if you want more. I saw some options that looked pretty good, although many were proprietary.


Proxmox is based on debian, with it’s own virtualization packages and system services that do something very similar to what libvirt does.
Libvirr + virt manager also uses qemu kvm as it’s underlying virtual machine software, meaning performance will be identical.
Although perhaps there will be a tiny difference due to libvirt’s use of the more performant spice for graphics vs proxmox’s novnc but it doesn’t really matter.
The true minimal setup is to just use qemu kvm directly, but the virtual machine performance will be the same as libvirt, in exchange for a very small reduction in overhead.


Idk what to tell you. I linked to sources showing that flathub signs everything, and that flatpak refuses to install unsigned packages by default.
If you have anything contrary feel free to link it.
Also you multi replied to this comment. Sometimes I had this issue with eternity.
Do you have a source or benchmarks for the last bullet point?
I am skeptical that optimizations like that wouldn’t already be implemented by postgres.
Edit: Btrfs has the worst performance for databases according to this benchmark.
https://www.dimoulis.net/posts/benchmark-of-postgresql-with-ext4-xfs-btrfs-zfs/