Okay back in the days of IRC, I met this script kiddie who said he’d hack me, just give him my IP address. So I sent him his IP address and he disappeared suddenly.
Okay back in the days of IRC, I met this script kiddie who said he’d hack me, just give him my IP address. So I sent him his IP address and he disappeared suddenly.
I mean, maybe that hour is a human swapping batteries and giving it a light cleaning?
Yes but it’s fucking expensive to invalidate a patent. Possibly in the millions of dollars. That’s how patent trolls succeed - it’s far cheaper to own a bad patent than to fight one.
Charging maybe? A robot’s gotta eat too.
Ironically security theater can have a a placebo effect on crime rates as well. It turns out that the likelihood that someone commits a crime is strongly correlated to the chance they believe they will get caught, not the actual chance of getting caught. That’s why fake security cameras are so effective.
Only up to the point where humans notice it. It’ll make AI images easier to detect, but still pretty for humans. Probably a win-win.
Yeah, in practice feeding AI its own outputs is totally fine as long as it’s only the outputs that are approved by users.
The real book is Quantum Entanglement for Babies. (You can see it on the spine.)
Agreed, numpy really could/should be built in.
Why would it be a bad sign that the language has built in tools for common things you need to do?
Use the time honored technique of lying on the birthdate form.
No no, you’re absolutely right. I’ve seen a good deal of that too in the culture I was raised in.
They have to hold that view! How else would a guy like that get sex once every nine months?
I see you just printed a bonchee.
Asking that question is the first step people need in order to finally come to that conclusion. We all just completed the process a loooooong time ago.
Sure, go for it. But good luck paying an army of copywriters to summarize every article you read.
That’s not what I’m implying. What I’m saying is that wasting time and effort on quality is pointless when the threshold for success is low.
For example, I could use aerospace quality parts (perfectly machined to micron-level tolerances) to build a toaster. However, while this would not increase the performance meaningfully, the cost would be orders of magnitude greater. Instead I can use shitty off-the-shelf parts because it doesn’t really make a difference.
Maybe in other words, engineering tolerances apply to LLMs too. They’re crude devices, but it’s totally fine if you have a crude problem.
The best thing would be that she doesn’t get any money. The second best is that her money depends on being trans-friendly.
It might be all I care about. Humans might always be better, but AI only has to be good enough at something to be valuable.
For example, summarizing an article might be incredibly low stakes (I’m feeling a bit curious today), or incredibly high stakes (I’m preparing a legal defense), depending on the context. An AI is sufficient for one use but not the other.
Probably to allow proper sideloading of apps, instead of the contrived bullshit they already tried to pull.