Regardless of what it is, it’s not worth the cost.

I think you projected a tone that was not there. It’s cool though. Just keep in mind that your interpretation is not always reality.

Literally anything can “enshittify”. A project being open source does not ensure that won’t happen.

you can’t fork it.

Well, technically you can, there’s nothing stopping you. There are 121 forks already. Not sure you can distribute it though.

Regardless of all of this, it’s just like any app or service. You can use it while it meets your needs and drop it when it doesn’t. In this particular case, you can at least see the source code and actually make sure that there’s nothing bad in there.

Re-read my comment. Did I say “open source”? Also, I reiterate my question, what does it being source available entail for you? Is there anything more insecure? Is there something you can’t do? This sounds more like a pet peeve than an actual problem.

Well, it’s not a need but a preference. I specifically asked what about it being “only” source available was preventing them from doing and they did not provide a response.

Uhm, no? I was talking about BW only as a client for Vaultwarden and mentioned thar Keyguard is an alternative client. There’s nothing “enshitified” about it. What exactly is the issue about it only being source available?

So no real reason then. Gotcha.

What is it exactly that you want to do but can’t? Anyone can audit the code, you could see if they were doing something sketchy. Sounds lile you just want to complain.

Their github page is public and you can review the code if you want to. What are you talking about?

And yet here they are, talking to people.

the client apps are still only supplied by Bitwarden

Not true. You could also use Keyguard.

I get your point but their argument is basically moving the goalpost. The important thing is if the company is net profitable, and they’re not.

Except that it doesn’t? They claimed 33bn in revenue, but they had 104bn net loss. So no, they were not profitable. In their IPO they literally claim to not be profitable and that they don’t ensure they’ll be profitable “in the future”. Not the near future, just the future as a whole.

Anthropic has a profitable business

You sure 'bout that?

Audio quality in calls with bluetooth sucks balls.

Adhd?

That’s simply false. The driver already exists, and they still refuse to add support. There’s a ticket about it on the SteamOS github page if you don’t believe me. Link.

EDIT: There’s a decky plugin for those (like me) tired of waiting. Link.

I’m using an 8bit ultimate 2c. For the price (think I paid 25 for it) it ca’t be beat.

However, I have two xbox controllers. One is about 6 years old and has bt but the other one is the older version that only worked with the dongle. Thankfully neither has stick drift. That’s not a “Microsoft” problem though, it’s simoly because the type of stick they use wears out. The steam deck has the same issue. If you want to fix it, you can just replace them with TMR or Hall Effect sticks.

Regardless of that, it’s a fact that they’re most likely the most popular pc controller, and there already is a way to use them on steam with the dongle. But the driver has to be reinstalled every single time you update. SteamOS has a ticket ablut this going back years and years but they refuse to add support.

EDIT: You don’t need tl constantly reinstall the driver, there’s a decky plugin to add support for the dongle. Link.

Meanwhile, the xbox controller usb dongle still hasn’t received support.

That’s a pretty pedantic comment. Yes, google changed the name but you still know what this is referring to.