I was really interested in who the pervert experts were, but it turns out it was just human rights groups.

deleted by creator

Imagine the universe as a spherical cow.

the precedent is set that it costs 3million per person

Far from it actually. If anything appeals may pare down damages and nonpunitive damages must be backed by actual calculations. The bigger point I think is this sort of case can survive.

Why put him in a high fall risk sock. He’s not a fall risk… Now meemaw is gonna take another tumble.

(Yellow typically denotes high fall risk in healthcare settings and this is a healthcare sock. Nurse life.)

The whole trinitarian debate is like a Lemmy comment chain of people completely talking past each other.

Should just have msg packets and get people used to that instead.

Well you could always go the boiled water and some salt route. “Yo dog I heard you liked shock so I infused some water with bacteria antigens in it so you could go into shock while you’re going into shock.”

Way too much potassium too (and gives a hint as to why it burns at the infusion site just like a k run would). It’s like d5w with potassium and mag. Potentially quite deadly over the long term. Thankfully the glucose in the coconut water treats hyperkalemia or it would be deadly in the short term.

For sure. They were fine invalidating mine and everybody else’s Puerto Rican birth certificate but they’ll never put this sort of administrative burden in action.

They’d only go bankrupt if they were spending the capital to increase capacity and were left holding the bag. And nobody’s interested in doing that.

I gave up on you having good faith in this thread a long long while back hoss, if you haven’t noticed.

Oh I see. Your argument that vegans or Lemmy users have a particular linguistic theory. I have to admit, I did kind of miss the idea that you had that sort of insight while telling everyone they don’t know what your personal opinion is in other posts. Primarily because the idea is so pants on head. I’m also glad you have intimate knowledge of the language usage of gestures vaguely the UK in regards to plant milk.

Uh huh. So your argument is you secretly don’t have one but are pointing in the general direction that maybe there’s an argument somewhere here and it’s right.

This post is prescriptive based on etymology. You’re being prescriptive based on regulation. You’re not making a descriptive argument that would be strong in this case(but wrong because casual usage DOES include plant milk so that’s why I don’t think you’re doing it). You’re making a fucking bizzaro world argument.

“Language changes unless my favored language authority says it doesn’t.” I honestly do not understand how you could take a perscriptive stance in FAVOR of language changes. It’s pretty much like looking at 1984 and saying “yes, this is the correct way of language evolution.”

You’re just hopped up on milk of paradise from the poppy for thinking this.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WkyPnpW7eQ8&pp=0gcJCUABo7VqN5tD