They can not recieve firmware updates. They are always provided by the OEM

*qbittorrent

And one in the display

Yes, a pro just needs some sand and a lighter and a needle

deleted by creator

Those numbers only include instances that have telemetry enabled

https://www.amazon.com/Livestock-Scratcher-Grooming-Scratchers-Livestocks/dp/B0CYCNCCTS

Ublock origin + sponsor block on desktop, ReVanced on Android and SmartTube on Android TV, no ads.

Probably not the best for focus on privacy but you can avoid ads

Aren’t apps better compareable to something like flatpack and this is the reason why they are updateable during runtime?

Cinnamon or something idk I use qtile

I also never used version pinning in debian

I broke a hinge myself that way, learned it the hard way

Did you open it without the backplate on?

Anyways this is crappy anti consumer design by the manufacturer.

Did the same in school on a Z80

You can check the SponsorBlock FAQ about this. They do not need to do additional reprocessing

I’m prette sure they have to send the metadata to the client where an ad starts and ends. Just to make the ad clickable.

Timestamps can be calculated on the server, but maybe there will be an api endpoint that can be abused to search for the ads.

The encryption on Android devices is pretty strong, as long as you use a good screen lock you should be fine. Yes they can reset you phone, but accessing your data is a whole other level.

If I had illegal shit on my phone, I wouldn’t send it to apple servers by using an iPhone. They are the first who would comply with a surpena. I’d use GrapheneOS on a Pixel and use an obvious duress pin like 1234. If entered it wipes your encryption keys and avoids restoring your data.

And if it gets stolen, it is gone and I’d get a new one. This is the cost of having proper opsec.

Edit:

But I also think that freedom allows for more exploits.

This is a common misconception called security through obscurity

Yes, opensource doesn’t magically fix all vulnerabilities. But it is for sure way better then closed source, where you don’t have a way of auditing the code

Then why is this the subtitle:

The apps identified have since been removed from Google Play, but make sure you didn’t install one.

I don’t fall for this, I switch back to Windows