

What do you think it would take to be a revolutionary in the US today and is anybody on their way there?
Reddit sucks
What do you think it would take to be a revolutionary in the US today and is anybody on their way there?
Not criticizing, but do you actually believe Luigi is innocent? Meaning he didn’t kill somebody or something else?
The new Che Guevara shirt. Hitting a Hot Topic near you.
Yup. It all starts with how we’re raising boys and what societal norms they’re expected to conform to. The main avenues that we give men to receive approval are limited to physical strength and violence, emotional toughness, sexual prowess/penis size, financial and social power and logical aptitude (which is waning as of late).
If you don’t meet these standards then you have to work hard to internally accept yourself and two of the skills men aren’t taught to practice are emotional intelligence and community building, hence the lonely male epidemic and resulting fits of violence.
We need to raise boys differently, and build a society where they have opportunities to build self-worth and have a community to lean on without feeling ashamed to need emotional support.
All that to say that today we have an epidemic of violent, emotionally inept, unsuccessful men.
Oh freaky! That’s a huge liability though. I don’t see that happening with a model anywhere close to what we’re using in ChatGPT.
Just say what you’re alluding to
They might not be able to feed your brain
This is an interesting comparison because the wire monkey study suggests that we need physical contact from a caregiver more than nourishment. In the case of AI, we’re getting some sort of mental nourishment from the AI, but no physical contact.
The solution? AI tools integrated into either hyper-realistic humanoid robots, or human robo-puppets.
Or, we could also leverage our advancing technology to support the working class by implementing UBI through a reduction in production costs and an evening out of wealth and resources.
But who wants that? I, a billionaire, sure don’t.
You never replied to the question in the post. You just came in with your own silly anti-AI agenda. Essentially showing that this discussion is a nonstarter for you. So I guess this was a valuable discussion after all.
I’m trying to gauge where the community has landed as of late, because like I said in the original post, there have been big shifts like opinions on Democrats and in regards to your questions, I’ve experience some strange intersection between misogyny and pro-transness.
You’re saying that people don’t want to discuss how science could be wrong or not universally true?
Yeah people just hear, “a study shows XYZ” and think, oh truth. When in fact there’s a lot of manipulation that goes into these studies similar to statistics and there are constantly debates among scientists who disagree with each other’s assertions.
Alright…since you’re being devil’s advocate I’ll lay out some criteria:
Do you have anything of value to contribute?
Fair, so what are some other unobvious non-starters
Yeah the hive mentality is so strong and inhibits progress.
It doesn’t even have to include an insult. Even the most clinical approach is stifled.
Thanks, but I didn’t ask that and your assertion is based on your own bias/opinion
Yeah I think the problem is that in order to address the problem you have to call out how widespread it is and that’s where people, men, get defensive and don’t allow the conversation
Exhibit A
Like the ICE agents?