Ok I see a lot if discussion on this topic but no one seems to have mentioned the main feature of the spec that makes them phishing resistant: presence detection. This is what makes FIDO resistant to credential replay. The spec is not perfect but it prevents most common phishing attacks.
It is a little slow at times, but the fun bits are really awesome. And you can get a linux package to display system info as !Krells
Fine. If you insist, I will include the periodic table in my password cracking table.
I transitioned to an ebike.
I enjoy watching sports, but I do not obsess over it. I have a MythTV DVR setup to record OTA broadcasts. It records some matches, I watch those matches. I skip all the commercials and a lot of the boring bits TBH. Sometimes I go watch highlights on Youtube of my favorite teams.
Most people are going to say personality, but I am going to go with breast size.
A quote (or mis-quote) from “So I Married an Axe Murderer” https://youtu.be/W_ENWgPmXnY?t=134
Am I the only one who thinks the name is too close to mamogram?
Dr X level Psionic powers, mind reading and mind control
TP Link is just as bad at security as most other consumer electronics vendors:
I let my kids play on my profile, but my kids were already teens when I bought it. The main problem I ran into was when they were playing and I wanted to play online on my pc I had to ask them to go into offline mode. I buy games that they want on my account and they can play online the steamdeck or from their laptop with family sharing.
Take a look at stick blenders. They are very versatile and eliminate a lot of the junk that comes with traditional food processors/blenders.
That makes sense. It is interesting to read the original blog post from Wikimedia:
https://diff.wikimedia.org/2025/10/17/new-user-trends-on-wikipedia/
and what they say you can do if you want to help:
"Active volunteers can further help meet this moment by working with Wikimedia Foundation teams to test out new experiences and tools on Wikipedia. As the internet changes rapidly, this is a moment to consider what parts of Wikipedia should change (and what parts should not), while staying true to the promise of human-centered, free knowledge for the world.
A specific area where volunteers can help is with our new readers teams. We welcome you to review the current experiments we are running and help us answer key questions about what will most help readers. Please join the readers teams on their talk page and sign up for their newsletter to share your thoughts and learn more about their work. We’ll also be reaching out to communities soon with both live and on-wiki ways to talk about these trends, and what they mean for the Wikimedia projects."
Fighting street crime is tough, hard to find and it leaves little evidence. White collar crime OTH often leaves a paper trail. They don’t wear capes, but investigative journalists use these paper trails to uncover such crimes.
Every time someone visits Wikipedia they make exactly $0. In fact, it costs them money. Are people still contributing and/or donating? These seem like more important questions to me.
There is definitely a bubble. But also what Nvidia is doing is smart. They have boatloads of cash. They are investing that cash in the companies that are using their products to create money making services. If one of them can create a killer app or viable service this will create demand for their products and they will have an ownership stake in it. Is this guaranteed or even likely? Probably not. We have reached the point where we were in 1996 where the chairman of the fed came out and said we are in a period of “irrational exuberance.” That bubble took four more years to pop. This one may end quicker, but it is impossible to tell when it will end or what will come out of it from where we sit today.
From the CDC website:
“Bacteria can multiply rapidly if left at room temperature or in the “Danger Zone” between 40°F and 140°F. Never leave perishable food out for more than 2 hours (or 1 hour if exposed to temperatures above 90°F).”
Einstein was not sure if the universe was expanding, contracting or static. He famously had a constant he could use to change this:
"…Einstein’s cosmological constant, is a coefficient that Albert Einstein initially added to his field equations of general relativity.
Einstein introduced the constant in 1917 to counterbalance the effect of gravity and achieve a static universe, which was then assumed. Einstein’s cosmological constant was abandoned after Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant