And anyone who has a retirement holding index funds is also complicit?

Being critAI is being proAI.

China has HOAs…

Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn

It’s what follows the signifiers that’s the tell

Yes, using the word “capitalism” is a signifier, but I wouldn’t say it’s counterproductive. Based on a person’s response you can quickly conclude whether they have the historical context to understand the critique. Defining capitalism as “a market-based” system is ahistorical , markets existed before capitalism. It is very hard to surface the critique while also writing a wall of text that describes how capitalism came to be and how it was later moderated

The issue is the term is meaningless if it isn’t grounded in history. If it simply means “the system you live in” then it says nothing of how it came to be and what can come after.

And if we had universal healthcare it would actually be cheaper to produce those cars. Canada is proof of this.

You could say the same of history if you know nothing about it

You would think seeing how we spend more on prisons then our schools…

It would be Useful for doing a retrospective on whether AI is helpful or not

It’s good for the artists, popularity is decided by the masses instead of a channel. But it’s bad for share holder value.

There are far more conservatives in academia than actual leftists. And there are more liberals in academia than both groups combined. See Catherine Liu for an example of an actual leftist in academia who speaks on this dynamic.

Because it would be immensely stupid

Obviously our lawmakers are communist and this is a ploy to undermine the very capable and responsible software maker called Microsoft /s

Maybe we can’t but climate change could.

Talk about a loss for all those who voted for irresponsible use of AI /s

And “States” when some are barely

This is what share holder value looks like.

Before Sting there was Police. So it’s Police Mary